日本の歴史クイズ - 日本史 一問一答 vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against 日本の歴史クイズ - 日本史 一問一答's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperStudySwitch, Inc.GETBOKS LLCJess TaylorKinfolk Tech FoundationAviametrix, LLCDavid Rumseysamet bilginBlumoon
CategoryEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationReferenceEducation
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.3 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 55.0 / 54.7 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count97281002600
PriceFreeFreeFreeFree$4.99FreeFreeFree
Release DateDec 12, 2014Mar 10, 2025Aug 14, 2020Feb 22, 2021Oct 26, 2024Dec 6, 2017Feb 24, 2026Feb 17, 2026
Last UpdatedFeb 25, 2026Oct 1, 2025Jan 17, 2026Apr 20, 2026Jan 10, 2026Dec 6, 2017Apr 10, 2026May 6, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-excellentpositive-excellent---
Score-85/10090/100-90/100---
Praises-
  • Flashcard study mode provides an effective and convenient way to master citizenship exam questions
--
  • Simplified access to complex historical data makes learning about pharaohs accessible for non-experts
---
Complaints-
  • Outdated exam question sets cause confusion and potential failure for users preparing for current tests
------
Requests-
  • Audio support for questions and answers would improve accessibility and study efficiency for users
------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • GIGA School integration functions as a B2B distribution moat into school-issued hardware
  • 14-era structure provides a granular, curriculum-aligned learning path
  • Gamified flashcard mechanics drive high daily active usage
  • Offline study mode ensures consistent access in low-connectivity environments
  • Dataset integrity via Stanford-managed source material
  • GeoJSON export enables professional research workflows
  • AR-driven visualization creates visceral site-specific engagement
  • Grassroots archive model provides unique historical perspectives
  • Non-profit status fosters high user trust
  • Drag-and-drop interface reduces barrier to entry for non-experts
  • Offline-first architecture supports museum and site-visit utility
  • Gardiner Code support establishes scholarly credibility
  • High-fidelity 3D globe rendering provides a specialized, niche experience for cartography enthusiasts
  • Infinite-scroll feed increases session duration
  • Interactive media elements boost active engagement
  • Daily highlights reinforce the open-app habit
-
Weaknesses
  • Text-only format lacks engagement compared to visual rivals
  • 0-rating count on Android indicates poor platform-specific visibility
  • Outdated exam questions trigger 1-star reviews
  • Excessive ad frequency disrupts the study interface
  • Zero community-driven retention loops
  • Static 2D map format lacks immersive engagement
  • Donation-based model limits rapid feature iteration
  • 128 total ratings indicates low user-base scale
  • No offline mode for location-based quests
  • $4.99 upfront cost creates high friction compared to freemium rivals
  • Zero Android rating count suggests poor platform-specific discovery
  • Lack of camera-based AI identification lags behind modern identification standards
  • Zero gamification or social sharing features limits daily active usage
  • No updates since 2017
  • Zero rating count on both platforms
  • Total reliance on third-party Wikipedia content
  • No offline reading capabilities
-
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreepaidfreefreemiumfree
MomentumMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceSteadyZombieIntense-
Update Cadence5 versions, ~184d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~121d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~29d avg2 versions, ~3d avg4 versions2 versions, ~1998d avg5 versions-

Compare 日本の歴史クイズ - 日本史 一問一答 head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by 日本の歴史クイズ - 日本史 一問一答, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0