LiveScore: Live Sports Scores vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against LiveScore: Live Sports Scores's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperLiveScore Ltd.Livesport s.r.o.365ScoresScore Media and Gaming Inc.FotMob ASSofascoreDAZN LimitedThe New York Times CompanyAppleFliff Inc.
CategorySportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSports
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count45,452107,284116,254832,815153,39872,642600,915234,821170,137155,635
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 22, 2010Dec 6, 2013Nov 5, 2012Feb 12, 2019Dec 22, 2011Dec 2, 2016Sep 11, 2018Sep 2, 2016Feb 21, 2024Dec 18, 2019
Last UpdatedMay 5, 2026Mar 30, 2026Apr 7, 2026Apr 22, 2026May 6, 2026Apr 23, 2026May 6, 2026Apr 13, 2026Mar 23, 2026Apr 7, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixed--mixedexcellentmixedterrible---
Score45/100--45/10085/10045/10015/100---
Praises
  • Real-time score updates provide faster match information than traditional television broadcasts for sports fans
--
  • Reliable and timely delivery of live sports scores and game statistics
  • Real-time match updates and live score notifications provide immediate engagement for football fans
  • Real-time score delivery speed provides a competitive advantage for users tracking live match events
  • High quality live streaming of sports matches provides a clear and smooth viewing experience
---
Complaints
  • Intrusive full-screen advertisements introduced in recent updates disrupt the core score-checking experience
--
  • Aggressive integration of gambling content and betting odds disrupts the core sports experience
  • Aggressive ad placement and mandatory data consent flows frustrate long-term users during navigation
  • Recent widget redesign removes essential functionality and reduces visibility of match information for daily users
  • Deceptive subscription practices lock users into annual contracts without clear disclosure during the signup process
---
Requests
  • Addition of player-specific match ratings and performance statistics to enhance the depth of data
--
  • Expansion of league coverage to include niche sports like rugby and softball
  • Spoiler-free viewing mode allows users to catch up on matches without seeing final scores
  • Reversion to the previous widget layout to restore scrolling functionality and better team badge visibility
  • Transparent cancellation process that allows users to end subscriptions without hidden fees or hurdles
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Real-time data latency beats traditional broadcast
  • High-utility data keeps users engaged during non-match hours
  • Multi-sport coverage broadens addressable market
--
  • High-frequency push notification engine drives daily habit
  • Social chat rooms increase session duration via community network effects
  • High-frequency push notification engine drives daily app opens
  • Deep statistical coverage (xG, shot maps) increases session duration
  • Wear OS integration reduces 30-day churn via multi-device presence
  • Proprietary attack-momentum visualization increases session depth
  • 25+ sport coverage depth creates high switching costs
  • Wear OS integration captures secondary-device engagement
  • Global rights portfolio secures exclusive access to major boxing and football events
  • FanZone social integration increases session duration via real-time interaction
---
Weaknesses
  • Full-screen ads disrupt core score-checking
  • Monetization of privacy settings triggers user anger
  • 0.3★ Android-iOS rating gap
--
  • Betting-focused content disrupts core sports experience
  • Notification deep-linking failures erode daily habit
  • Technical instability post-update
  • Premium tier monetization relies on intrusive ad banners
  • Complex data consent flows increase navigation friction
  • Inaccurate MVP scoring metrics diminish perceived analysis quality
  • Widget redesign reduces daily utility
  • Intrusive ad placements trigger churn
  • Perceived bias in player rating algorithms erodes trust
  • Deceptive annual billing practices drive high-churn sentiment
  • Technical instability during live events causes playback failures
---
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreemium
MomentumActiveIntenseIntenseActiveActiveActiveIntenseIntenseIntenseIntense
Update Cadence5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions, ~7d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~15d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~10d avg5 versions, ~9d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions

Compare LiveScore: Live Sports Scores head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LiveScore: Live Sports Scores, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0