MARLVEL

Loom: Screen Recorder vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Loom: Screen Recorder's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Loom: Screen Recorder
This App
ServiceTrade
Peer
SOTI Snap
Peer
ERA OneTeam
Peer
WFP Private
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperLoom, IncServiceTrade, Inc.SOTI Inc.KonverseKonverse
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityProductivity
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.2 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count17,542585000
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateDec 9, 2019Apr 23, 2013Apr 29, 2017Feb 4, 2022Feb 8, 2017
Last UpdatedMay 11, 2026May 5, 2026Mar 28, 2026Jan 7, 2026Sep 8, 2023
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativemixed---
Score35/10065/100---
Praises
  • The core video recording functionality provides significant value for business process documentation and team communication
  • The simple and fast workflow allows for efficient information sharing without requiring lengthy meetings
----
Complaints
  • Persistent authentication loops prevent users from accessing their accounts and utilizing the application features
  • Technical instability including app crashes and upload failures disrupts the core recording experience
  • Aggressive subscription and cancellation flows create friction for users attempting to manage their accounts
----
Requests
  • Simultaneous screen and camera recording functionality is requested to improve tutorial and presentation quality
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Time-stamped collaboration features create team-based network effects
  • Link-based sharing workflow reduces professional communication friction
  • Mature mobile interface sustains high user trust across iOS and Android
  • Established brand presence in commercial service sector
  • Industrial hardware integration (NFC/Barcode) anchors field-service retention
  • Blockly logic builder lowers internal development barriers
  • Offline-first synchronization ensures data integrity in remote environments
  • Enterprise-grade SSO integrations create high switching costs for corporate IT departments.
  • Real-time analytics dashboard provides operational visibility for field-based managers.
  • Project-based loop architecture provides superior context for task-specific communication
  • Deskless-first configuration enables penetration into non-office environments
Weaknesses
  • Authentication loops block new-user onboarding
  • Upload failures cause data loss during recording
  • Subscription management friction creates churn risk
  • Manual documentation workflows increase technician time-on-site
  • Lack of hardware-integrated asset scanning compared to BuildOps
  • Zero public rating volume on iOS
  • Pricing model lacks transparency for non-enterprise users
  • Reliance on SOTI ONE platform restricts independent adoption
  • Demo-gated sales process restricts top-of-funnel conversion for smaller organizations.
  • No public pricing transparency compared to SaaS competitors.
  • No public pricing model complicates the initial sales funnel
  • Lack of recent feature updates signals potential maintenance-mode status
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumpaidsubscription
MomentumZombieMaintenance---
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~13d avg---

Compare Loom: Screen Recorder head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Loom: Screen Recorder, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0