Loom: Screen Recorder vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Loom: Screen Recorder's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperLoom, IncServiceTrade, Inc.SOTI Inc.KonverseKonverse
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityProductivity
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.2 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count17,542585000
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateDec 9, 2019Apr 23, 2013Apr 29, 2017Feb 4, 2022Feb 8, 2017
Last UpdatedMay 11, 2026May 5, 2026Mar 28, 2026Jan 7, 2026Sep 8, 2023
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativemixed---
Score35/10065/100---
Praises
  • The core video recording functionality provides significant value for business process documentation and team communication
  • The simple and fast workflow allows for efficient information sharing without requiring lengthy meetings
----
Complaints
  • Persistent authentication loops prevent users from accessing their accounts and utilizing the application features
  • Technical instability including app crashes and upload failures disrupts the core recording experience
  • Aggressive subscription and cancellation flows create friction for users attempting to manage their accounts
----
Requests
  • Simultaneous screen and camera recording functionality is requested to improve tutorial and presentation quality
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Time-stamped collaboration features create team-based network effects
  • Link-based sharing workflow reduces professional communication friction
  • Mature mobile interface sustains high user trust across iOS and Android
  • Established brand presence in commercial service sector
  • Industrial hardware integration (NFC/Barcode) anchors field-service retention
  • Blockly logic builder lowers internal development barriers
  • Offline-first synchronization ensures data integrity in remote environments
  • Enterprise-grade SSO integrations create high switching costs for corporate IT departments.
  • Real-time analytics dashboard provides operational visibility for field-based managers.
  • Project-based loop architecture provides superior context for task-specific communication
  • Deskless-first configuration enables penetration into non-office environments
Weaknesses
  • Authentication loops block new-user onboarding
  • Upload failures cause data loss during recording
  • Subscription management friction creates churn risk
  • Manual documentation workflows increase technician time-on-site
  • Lack of hardware-integrated asset scanning compared to BuildOps
  • Zero public rating volume on iOS
  • Pricing model lacks transparency for non-enterprise users
  • Reliance on SOTI ONE platform restricts independent adoption
  • Demo-gated sales process restricts top-of-funnel conversion for smaller organizations.
  • No public pricing transparency compared to SaaS competitors.
  • No public pricing model complicates the initial sales funnel
  • Lack of recent feature updates signals potential maintenance-mode status
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumpaidsubscription
MomentumZombieMaintenance---
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~13d avg---

Compare Loom: Screen Recorder head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Loom: Screen Recorder, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0