Ludo SuperStar vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Ludo SuperStar's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Ludo STAR
Nemesis
Ludo King
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperBlackLight Studio WorksGameberry LabsMoonfrogGAMETION GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES PTE LIMITEDNEOCLASSIC TECHMiniclip.comGameberry Labs
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGames
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.5 / 54.4 / 53.7 / 53.8 / 54.6 / 54.3 / 5
Ratings Count1,20798,73447,76918,6321312,3623,745
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 29, 2018Mar 9, 2017Sep 8, 2017Feb 20, 2016Jan 22, 2016Apr 27, 2021Oct 8, 2019
Last UpdatedApr 25, 2026Apr 30, 2026Apr 15, 2026May 19, 2026Oct 23, 2024Oct 6, 2025Apr 23, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixednegativenegativenegative-negativenegative
Score45/10025/10032/10025/100-35/10025/100
Praises
  • Core gameplay loop provides an engaging and addictive experience for casual players
  • Core gameplay loop provides an engaging and classic experience for casual players
  • Entertainment Value
  • Visual Appeal
  • Core gameplay loop provides an addictive and competitive experience for daily players
-
  • General Enjoyment
  • Offline Playability
  • Core gameplay mechanics provide an addictive and enjoyable experience for casual players
  • Visual design and graphics quality exceed expectations compared to competing titles
Complaints
  • Perceived algorithmic bias in dice rolls creates an unfair and frustrating experience
  • Aggressive monetization tactics pressure players to purchase power-ups to remain competitive
  • Perceived algorithmic bias in dice rolls creates a rigged and unfair competitive environment
  • Perceived Rigging and Unfair RNG
  • Pay-to-Win Mechanics
  • Technical Performance
  • Perceived algorithmic manipulation of dice rolls creates an unfair and rigged environment
  • Aggressive monetization tactics and intrusive advertisements disrupt the core gameplay flow
-
  • Rigged Gameplay/Algorithm
  • Bot/Fake Players
  • Aggressive ad frequency post-match disrupts the flow and degrades the user experience
  • Technical instability and connection errors prevent consistent access to game features
Requests
  • Fairer matchmaking and balanced dice mechanics to ensure honest competitive gameplay
  • Reintroduction of the fast-paced quick mode to reduce match duration for casual players
-
  • Voice chat functionality during gameplay to improve social interaction between players
--
  • Reliable cloud synchronization and progress recovery to prevent data loss
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Voice chat integration increases social stickiness [Feature Analysis]
  • Specialized game modes (Blitz/Retro) differentiate from standardized competitors [Feature Analysis]
  • Clubs social network effects increase session frequency
  • Season Pass recurring IAP conversion mechanism
  • Massive 200M+ player base
  • Unique 'Club' social infrastructure
  • Fast-paced game variants (Dash/Rush)
  • 1.75 billion download base sustains matchmaking liquidity
  • Cross-platform support ensures accessibility on low-end hardware
  • Daily goals loop reinforces open-app habit
-
  • Miniclip brand recognition
  • Private social lobby system
  • Functional offline practice mode
  • Social club network effects drive DAU/MAU ratios
  • Visual design aesthetics outperform legacy-heavy incumbents
Weaknesses
  • Perceived dice-roll bias creates churn risk [Sentiment Analysis]
  • High ad frequency disrupts game flow [Sentiment Analysis]
  • Premium tier perceived as pay-to-win [Sentiment Analysis]
  • Perceived algorithmic bias drives negative sentiment
  • Facebook login failures disrupt daily play habit
  • High frequency of 'rigged RNG' complaints
  • Significant battery drain issues
  • Perceived aggressive pay-to-win monetization
  • 4.16 Android rating vs 3.73 iOS rating gap
  • High-frequency complaints regarding rigged dice mechanics
  • Intrusive ad-load disrupts core gameplay
-
  • Perceived RNG manipulation (Rubber Banding)
  • High bot density in multiplayer
  • Aggressive ad-driven technical interruptions
  • 0.32 rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Uncredited purchases and reward failures drive churn
  • Aggressive post-match ad frequency
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemium
MomentumActiveActiveMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceActive
Update Cadence5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~19d avg5 versions, ~7d avg5 versions, ~3d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~26d avg5 versions2 versions, ~4d avg5 versions, ~12d avg

Compare Ludo SuperStar head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ludo SuperStar, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0