Macros: Calorie Calculator vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Macros: Calorie Calculator's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

FlashSnack
Contender
milkberi
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperMehmet BayramHealthifyMe Private LimitedNETTRACK LLCGluroo Imaginations Inc.HAVYN LLCJommi UG (haftungsbeschrankt)OLEKSANDR YASHCHUKRiafy Technologies Pvt. Ltd.Joachim BrunsBiographics Consultoria e Design LTDA
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessLifestyleLifestyle
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.6 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.6 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 52.0 / 51.0 / 5
Ratings Count05,9702310816211
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 17, 2022Dec 17, 2014Mar 12, 2026Apr 26, 2026Mar 11, 2026Aug 18, 2018Jun 2, 2025Oct 27, 2022Apr 14, 2016Jun 9, 2025
Last UpdatedJan 22, 2024Apr 9, 2026Apr 8, 2026May 6, 2026May 10, 2026Jun 13, 2024May 14, 2026Jul 16, 2025Apr 14, 2016Jun 9, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-negative------terrible-
Score-20/100------20/100-
Praises-
  • Extensive food database covering diverse Indian and international cuisines supports accurate tracking
--------
Complaints-
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic features like macro tracking and calorie goals frustrates long-term users
--------
Requests-
  • Bidirectional data synchronization with Apple Health and Health Connect for comprehensive tracking
--------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Native iOS architecture ensures faster load times and lower battery consumption than cross-platform competitors.
  • Minimalist interface reduces cognitive load for users overwhelmed by feature-heavy dashboards.
  • Infinite food database covering global cuisines sustains high initial adoption
  • AI-driven Snap technology reduces logging friction compared to manual-entry competitors
  • Human-coaching tier provides a high-margin revenue anchor
  • AI-driven descriptive logging removes manual entry friction
  • Conversational nutrition chat provides immediate feedback loops
  • Frictionless photo-to-macro conversion mechanism
  • Google Health Connect interoperability for cross-tool data utility
----
  • Lightweight interface reduces cognitive load for users seeking simple logging.
-
Weaknesses
  • Zero automated logging features force high-friction manual entry.
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user demand for cross-device data persistence.
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features drives high churn
  • Poor support responsiveness regarding subscription cancellations
  • Technical instability post-update
  • Reliance on USDA database limits recognition accuracy
  • No monetization model creates sustainability risk
  • Zero monetization layer limits development runway
  • Lack of regional food database reduces accuracy
----
  • 2.0 rating on the only review signals poor user satisfaction.
  • No wearable integration limits utility for active users.
-
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefree
Momentum-MaintenanceMaintenance-IntenseZombieIntense-Zombie-
Update Cadence-2 versions, ~34d avg1 versions-5 versions5 versions5 versions-1 versions-

Compare Macros: Calorie Calculator head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Macros: Calorie Calculator, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0