Report updated May 19, 2026
F***
For film enthusiasts seeking visual-heavy, concise editorial content without long-form text.
F*** is an established entertainment app that is available. With a 5.0/5 rating from 4 reviews, it shows polarized user reception.
What is F***?
F*** is a film magazine app for iOS that prioritizes visual storytelling over text-heavy editorial content.
Users hire F*** for a curated, image-led film analysis experience that avoids the clutter of traditional digital bookstores, serving a niche need for concise, visual-first media consumption.
Current Momentum
v7.0 · 99mo ago
Zombie- No notable signals last 3 months.
Active Nemesis
Amazon Kindle: Reading App
By AMZN Mobile
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
EntertainmentNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
Loading...
What Are The Key Features?
Magazine articles and media produced exclusively for the app, prioritizing visual storytelling over text.
Dedicated interface for viewing magazine content with a focus on visual layout.
In-app purchase flow for three-month and annual magazine access.
How much does it cost?
- Three months subscription at $10.99
- One year subscription at $39.99
Subscription-only model anchored at $39.99 annually, utilizing automatic renewal via iTunes to minimize churn.
Who Built It?
Providing centralized digital access to a vast global catalog of magazines and newspapers. Enabling institutional and individual readers to consume premium periodicals across multiple devices.
Portfolio
13
Apps
What other apps does Magzter make?
Business Today Malaysia
Tatler Hong Kong
Coches Revista
Outlook
Ekonomist Dergisi
Open Source For You
Explore the full Magzter report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Magzter.
What do users think recently?
Analysis in progress, available soon
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for F***?
Where is it available?
Localized markets (1)
How's The Entertainment Market?
Market outlook for this category
Available very soon
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
iPusnas competes by dominating the digital reading space with a massive library and social features that capture the same audience interested in content-heavy media consumption.
Contenders(4)
Mọt Truyện competes by providing a high-frequency, library-style experience that keeps users engaged through constant content updates.
This app competes by offering a dedicated digital environment for specific literary works, capturing readers who prefer focused, single-title experiences.
RedChapters targets the same entertainment-seeking demographic by focusing on high-engagement, trope-based narrative content.
Differentiators
- Serialized content delivery model encourages daily app engagement through cliffhangers and frequent narrative updates
- Hyper-niche focus on supernatural romance genres creates a highly engaged, community-driven user base
This app competes for the attention of users seeking interactive, narrative-driven content rather than traditional static media.
Same space(3)
MovieBuddy competes for the film-enthusiast audience by providing utility-focused tools for tracking and managing media collections.
This app competes by acting as a discovery engine for readers, similar to how a film magazine guides movie consumption.
Story Craft competes by offering personalized, generative content that appeals to users seeking tailored entertainment experiences.
Compare F*** against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for F***
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Visual-first editorial voice provides a curated experience for film enthusiasts
- Niche aesthetic avoids the cluttered interface of general-purpose bookstores
Critical Frictions
- Premium tier at $39.99/year lacks a freemium bridge
- No offline reading mode despite competitor standards
- Static content delivery limits daily re-engagement
Growth Levers
- Implement a freemium model to increase top-of-funnel conversion
- Integrate video/audio content to compete with multimedia-heavy digital flipbooks
Market Threats
- Amazon Kindle's ecosystem dominance
- Rising demand for AI-powered text-to-speech accessibility features
- Shift toward interactive, animated digital storytelling
What are the next best moves?
Ship a freemium tier because the $39.99 annual subscription is a high barrier to entry → increase top-of-funnel conversion.
The subscription-only model lacks a bridge for casual users, limiting the potential user base.
Trade-off: Pause the development of new editorial content — user acquisition is the current priority.
Audit offline reading capabilities because competitors provide this standard utility → reduce churn risk.
Competitors like Kindle offer superior offline reading, making the target app less reliable for mobile users.
Trade-off: Same-quarter capacity available — no major lever displaced.
A counter-intuitive read
The lack of feature updates is not a failure but a deliberate choice to maintain a static, high-end magazine feel that avoids the clutter of modern, algorithm-driven reading apps.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Offline reading mode (available in Amazon Kindle but absent here)
- Multimedia integration (available in FlipHTML5 but absent here)
- Text-to-speech conversion (available in Text to Speech Reader App but absent here)
Key Takeaways
F*** maintains a loyal niche through its visual-first editorial focus, but the lack of feature evolution and a rigid subscription-only model leaves it exposed to more dynamic digital reading platforms, so the PM should prioritize a freemium bridge to lower the conversion barrier.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
The digital magazine market is shifting toward interactive and multimedia-rich content, leaving static apps like F*** in a vulnerable position. The PM must decide whether to maintain the current editorial purity or pivot toward a more dynamic, feature-rich platform to prevent long-term audience attrition.
The app maintains a consistent, static editorial format that avoids the churn-heavy update cycles of its competitors.
The absence of feature updates limits the app's ability to compete with multimedia-integrated rivals, potentially eroding its niche audience over time.