Mineralogy Database by e-Rocks vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Mineralogy Database by e-Rocks's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Rockd
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperMark WrigleyMunure TuzunInkolabUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Shared AppsLaurence WayneGoran Ugresic
CategoryUtilitiesReferenceEducationEducationEducationEducation
PlatformiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating3.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.4 / 54.6 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count227181180
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 16, 2019Dec 4, 2025Dec 2, 2024Sep 17, 2016May 22, 2025Feb 17, 2025
Last UpdatedMar 18, 2021Dec 4, 2025Aug 11, 2025Feb 21, 2026May 11, 2026Mar 6, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositive-mixedmixed--
Score70/100-55/10055/100--
Praises
  • Detailed mineral descriptions provide educational value for both novice and experienced geology enthusiasts
-
  • Mineral identification accuracy provides significant utility for users exploring geological samples in the field
  • Extensive geological data and map resources provide significant value for field research and education
--
Complaints
  • Navigation flow breaks when returning from mineral detail pages to the main search interface
-
  • Aggressive premium paywalls interrupt the core scanning workflow and prevent basic functionality usage
  • Frequent black screen crashes and infinite loading loops prevent consistent access to the application
--
Requests---
  • Customizable unit and geologic period settings would improve utility for international users
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Collector portal membership gate increases switching costs via user-generated collection data
  • Offline database access sustains utility for field researchers in remote locations
  • AI-powered identification engine enables instant specimen classification
  • Integrated market valuation provides a clear monetization anchor for collectors
  • AI identification engine provides immediate utility for field users
  • Rocksy assistant gamifies the discovery process
  • Deep integration with Macrostrat and Paleobiology databases creates a professional-grade field documentation moat.
  • AI-driven identification provides immediate utility for field-based specimen classification
  • Narrative-driven formation histories differentiate the app from raw chemical data references
  • My Garden collection creates user-specific switching costs
  • Social sharing features drive organic acquisition loops
Weaknesses
  • 3.0-star rating reflects navigation friction in the search interface
  • Stalled update cadence since 2021 limits competitive relevance
  • Subscription-only access to core identification features limits free-tier utility
  • Lack of social or mapping features reduces long-term user stickiness
  • Aggressive premium paywalls interrupt core scanning
  • Technical instability causes frequent application crashes
  • Frequent launch-time black screen crashes erode trust among professional users relying on the tool for field work.
  • Subscription gate for unlimited identifications limits the top-of-funnel conversion for casual users
  • Low review count (18 ratings) indicates limited social proof for new users
  • Zero-revenue model lacks long-term sustainability
  • No subscription gates limit capital for AI training
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreefreemiumfree
MomentumZombieZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceZombie-
Update Cadence1 versions1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~227d avg2 versions, ~1d avg1 versions-

Compare Mineralogy Database by e-Rocks head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mineralogy Database by e-Rocks, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0