MARLVEL

Performance Beef vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Performance Beef's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Performance Beef
This App
Ag Leader AgFiniti
Nemesis
FeedlotManager
Contender
Telemetria Stara
Contender
Cropin Grow
Contender
Vultus
Contender
Farmable: Farm Manager App
Peer
Cropwise Financials
Peer
EzyAgric Farmer
Peer
FieldView Cab
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperPerformance Livestock AnalyticsAg Leader TechnologyNext Gen Ag TechStara SA Industria de Implementos AgricolasCropIn Technology Solutions Private LimitedSoftwerk ABFarmable ASSyngenta Digital LTDAAkorion Company LimitedThe Climate Corporation - US
CategoryProductivityProductivityBusinessProductivityBusinessEducationProductivityBusinessBusinessProductivity
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSAndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.3 / 53.9 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 53.9 / 54.4 / 53.6 / 53.8 / 5
Ratings Count671200001110514170
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 2, 2017Apr 15, 2019Dec 11, 2024Aug 20, 2021Sep 8, 2020Aug 25, 2023Apr 3, 2019Dec 6, 2021Jun 16, 2017Feb 17, 2012
Last UpdatedSep 20, 2022Nov 11, 2025May 13, 2026Apr 23, 2026May 7, 2026Feb 28, 2025May 10, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 26, 2026Apr 15, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-mixed----mixed--mixed
Score-55/100----65/100--45/100
Praises-
  • Agronomic data review and equipment tracking provide value for field operations
----
  • Simple and convenient to use
--
  • Data visualization tools provide actionable insights for field management and hybrid selection decisions
  • Cross-platform hardware compatibility allows farmers to monitor diverse machinery brands in one place
Complaints-
  • Login errors and connectivity failures prevent data access in the field
  • Outdated interface design makes the application difficult to navigate for users
----
  • Limited free-tier spray record capacity
--
  • Inaccurate acre counting and field mapping data erode trust in the platform for operational planning
  • Subscription requirements for basic data access create friction for long-term agricultural users
Requests-
  • Localized language support for Japanese users to improve regional usability
-------
  • Customizable color palettes for maps are required to support colorblind users in field analysis
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Bluetooth scale integration automates feed delivery data entry
  • Advisor access creates a B2B distribution moat via nutritionists
  • Third-party data integration reduces switching costs for mixed-fleet operators
  • Remote display access provides a direct B2B revenue gate
  • Bilingual interface (English/Spanish) lowers adoption barriers for diverse yard-level workforces
  • Cloud-native architecture enables faster feature iteration than legacy-heavy competitors
  • Hardware-integrated telemetry provides high-fidelity machine performance data
  • Free utility model lowers barrier to entry for Stara customers
  • Proprietary crop knowledge grid of 399+ crops provides predictive intelligence moat
  • Centralized platform architecture maps complex multi-season project data for enterprise supply chains
  • Satellite-based crop health analysis enables granular input savings
  • Role-based access control secures enterprise-level organizational hierarchies
  • Partner portal creates B2B distribution barrier
  • Mobile-first interface lowers entry friction
  • Syngenta-backed data integration provides deep financial ROI views
  • Regulatory reporting module automates compliance for large-scale operations
-
  • Proprietary hardware-software integration creates high switching costs
  • Cross-platform machinery compatibility aggregates diverse fleet data
Weaknesses
  • Demo-request sales model limits top-of-funnel conversion
  • No offline mode despite remote operational environments
  • Login failures and GPS inaccuracy hinder daily field use
  • Interface design is described as clunky and outdated
  • Manual data entry requirements create high administrative friction
  • No native hardware API integrations for automated weight tracking
  • Zero public rating volume limits social proof
  • Closed-loop design prevents data ingestion from non-Stara machinery
  • Closed-access RFP process limits organic discovery compared to self-serve competitors
  • Lack of public-facing pricing creates friction for smaller cooperative leads
  • Zero rating count across major platforms
  • Lack of real-time hardware data feeds
  • 5-job free limit drives churn
  • Manual data entry lacks hardware automation
  • Gated AgriEdge partnership restricts user acquisition
  • 10 total ratings indicate low platform visibility
  • Lacks native equipment-telemetry integration
-
  • Inaccurate acre counting and mapping data
  • Subscription-gated access to historical data
  • Connectivity instability with field hardware
Pricingsubscriptionfreemiumfreefreepaidsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfreefreemium
MomentumZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-Maintenance
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~168d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~7d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~1d avg1 versions-2 versions, ~22d avg

Compare Performance Beef head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Performance Beef, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0