MARLVEL

Pulsar by CampaignSidekick vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Pulsar by CampaignSidekick's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Pulsar by CampaignSidekick
This App
PA Chase
Nemesis
S2K Remote Field Service
Peer
Townsquare Management Platform
Peer
ECI MobileTech
Peer
CallHub
Peer
PastureMap+
Peer
Textedly
Peer
EZRentOut
Peer
GraphQL Summit 2025 by Apollo
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperCampaignSidekick LLCSuperfeed Technologies, IncECi Software SolutionsTownsquare Interactive,LLCECi Software SolutionsGaglers IncPasturemap Inc.The Texting Company, LLCEZ Web EnterprisesApollo GraphQL
CategoryBusinessNewsBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusiness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating3.1 / 54.7 / 51.0 / 53.9 / 54.0 / 54.6 / 52.9 / 55.0 / 54.6 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count861327546318350
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 25, 2024Feb 16, 2024Nov 2, 2020Jan 19, 2020Mar 12, 2020Jan 19, 2022Aug 24, 2023Apr 30, 2026Aug 14, 2014Sep 1, 2025
Last UpdatedApr 29, 2026Apr 30, 2026Sep 14, 2023Aug 29, 2024Mar 26, 2026May 6, 2026Apr 28, 2026May 6, 2026May 14, 2026Nov 19, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixed--negative--negative---
Score45/100--25/100--30/100---
Praises
  • Efficient voter contact functionality supports field teams during door knocking and phone banking sessions
--
  • Business management tools provide a centralized hub for organizing daily professional workflows and client communications
--
  • Map overview functionality provides clear visibility into rest days for pasture management
---
Complaints
  • Frequent application instability and reset requirements disrupt the canvassing workflow for field users
  • Navigation complexity and interface design changes hinder productivity compared to previous versions
--
  • Aggressive billing practices and difficulty canceling subscriptions lead to accusations of deceptive business conduct
  • Unreliable notification systems cause missed client messages and potential loss of business opportunities
--
  • Navigation and editing complexity in the latest version hinders core pasture management workflows
---
Requests---
  • Direct contact email access for support to resolve account and billing disputes
--
  • Search functionality for gates and fencers is required to improve navigation efficiency
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Relational database integration creates high switching costs for political organizations
  • Offline-first synchronization secures rural field contracts
--
  • High-touch support model creates client retention
  • All-in-one suite increases operational switching costs
-
  • Bi-directional CRM sync functions as a B2B distribution barrier into established political campaign workflows.
  • Predictive dialer algorithm sustains high-volume outreach efficiency for enterprise-grade users.
  • Offline GPS mapping ensures utility in remote field environments
  • Grazing charting functions as a paid-tier gate for Pro subscribers
  • AI voice agents enable 24/7 inbound handling for resource-constrained small businesses.
  • Text-to-pay integration reduces friction in the customer conversion funnel.
  • Native financial integrations with Xero and QuickBooks automate accounting workflows for professional rental businesses.
  • Asset-level tracking provides granular visibility into inventory status for distributed teams.
  • Technical content access on AI agents functions as a B2B distribution moat for the core GraphQL platform.
  • Targeted audience focus ensures high-intent engagement among API architects and platform engineers.
Weaknesses
  • Frequent app resets during canvassing sessions
  • Navigation complexity slows down field productivity
  • 3.18 average rating indicates reliability gaps
--
  • High billing friction and cancellation difficulty
  • Unreliable push notifications causing missed revenue
  • Technical instability in contact import functions
-
  • Premium tier pricing sits above the category median for small-scale users.
  • No offline-mode support despite the mobile-first field-outreach use case.
  • Data-loss reports following the latest update
  • Geometric drawing limitations in pasture subdivision
  • 0.86★ Android-iOS rating gap
  • Lack of enterprise-grade approval workflows limits penetration into highly regulated corporate sectors.
  • Android version currently lacks the rating volume and user feedback present on iOS.
  • Cloud-dependent architecture prevents usage in remote field environments.
  • Subscription-only access creates a high barrier to entry for small-scale rental operators.
  • Zero rating count on iOS and Android platforms indicates low user adoption.
  • No native networking or sponsor discovery features compared to event-platform rivals.
Pricingpaidfreefreesubscriptionfreefreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfree
MomentumMaintenanceIntense-Zombie-MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~23d avg5 versions-2 versions, ~487d avg-2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~56d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~50d avg

Compare Pulsar by CampaignSidekick head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pulsar by CampaignSidekick, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0