Low confidence · Latest 61 of 75 total reviews analyzed · Based on 75 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Frustrated
Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate property managers find the mobile tool useful for managing listings on the go, but report mobile application functionality is limited to a basic web browser wrapper and authentication failures prevent users from accessing accounts or viewing properties.
Rating: 2.8
Reviews: 75
Confidence: low
How did the latest release land?
Overall
2.7/ 5
★★★★★★
(91)Current version
3.0/ 5
+0.4 vs overall
★★★★★
(21)Main signal post-update: property managers find the mobile tool useful for managing listings on the go.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Not enough recent reviews to plot a sentiment trend.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Property managers find the mobile tool useful for managing listings on the go
- “Managers report the tool is effective for showing properties while traveling”
- “Large firms cite the utility of the mobile interface for remote property oversight”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Mobile application functionality is limited to a basic web browser wrapper
- “Users report the app simply redirects to the mobile website”
- “The experience is described as a bookmark rather than a functional application”
- Authentication failures prevent users from accessing accounts or viewing properties
- “Multiple reports of valid login credentials being rejected by the app”
- “Users unable to verify phone numbers or access scheduled viewing codes”