Scheels vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Scheels's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Scheels
This App
Pinkoi
Contender
Quince
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperScheels All Sports IncDepop LtdPinkoiStudent Price Card Ltd.Lastbrand IncFINN FLAREDavid EritsyanMajid Al Futtaim Properties LLCTiendeo Web Marketing S.L.ION Orchard
CategoryShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShopping
PlatformiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.9 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.6 / 54.9 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 53.1 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count11,554836,8661,9163,3715,9006,7373,288141,8843,753
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMay 14, 2021Aug 1, 2012Sep 1, 2012Jul 30, 2014Mar 2, 2025Mar 22, 2018Nov 13, 2020Jan 25, 2019Dec 21, 2011May 20, 2010
Last UpdatedMay 13, 2026May 18, 2026Apr 7, 2026May 14, 2026May 15, 2026May 6, 2026Feb 24, 2026May 20, 2026May 11, 2026May 11, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-negativepositive-positive-mixedmixedexcellent-
Score-35/10085/100-75/100-45/10045/10085/100-
Praises-
  • Wide variety of vintage and second-hand clothing items keeps fashion-conscious buyers engaged
  • High quality of original design goods
-
  • High product quality and material standards drive strong customer satisfaction across clothing and home categories
-
  • The core sneaker drop notification system provides timely alerts for users seeking limited footwear releases
-
  • Centralized access to local retail catalogues provides significant convenience for price comparison shoppers
  • Digital catalogue access reduces reliance on physical paper mailers and minimizes household waste
  • Fast and responsive interface performance improves the efficiency of finding current store deals
-
Complaints-
  • High shipping costs and additional marketplace fees significantly inflate the final purchase price
  • Shipping costs for international orders
-
  • Deep-linking issues force users into the app store instead of opening specific product pages
-
  • Unauthorized subscription charges and lack of clear cancellation paths frustrate users who never intended to pay
-
  • Inaccurate or outdated store location data causes confusion for users visiting physical branches
  • Navigation complexity following recent interface changes makes finding specific product categories difficult
-
Requests-
  • Implementation of binding offers would prevent non-paying buyers from wasting seller time
--
  • Implementation of a meaningful rewards program to incentivize referrals and user-generated content
---
  • Integration of loyalty card storage would consolidate shopping tools into a single application
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • High-trust physical retail brand identity sustains customer loyalty
  • Integrated credit card management creates a sticky financial utility
  • Social-first discovery feed drives high-intent fashion engagement
  • AI-powered listing automation reduces seller time-to-market
  • 1-on-1 designer chat builds trust for custom goods
  • Curated editor picks ensure high-quality inventory
  • Bonus point system drives repeat purchases
-
  • Factory-direct model captures margins to sustain lower price points
  • 365-day return policy functions as a primary conversion barrier
-
  • Lightweight discovery interface reduces cognitive load compared to marketplace-heavy rivals
  • Automated aggregation of 20+ brands provides a centralized discovery hub
  • Direct integration with physical mall infrastructure drives high-intent local traffic
  • SHARE rewards program creates a B2B loyalty moat across 5,000+ partner stores
  • Centralized catalogue aggregation replaces physical mailers, driving high daily utility
  • Fast interface performance sustains user engagement post-update
-
Weaknesses
  • Lack of gamified loyalty loops limits daily active usage
  • Product catalog browsing lacks modern visual search or AR capabilities
  • High shipping and marketplace fees inflate purchase prices
  • Inconsistent support resolution drives seller churn
  • Missing dark mode interface
  • High international shipping costs
  • Lack of algorithmic social discovery
  • Fragmented navigation compared to mass-market apps
-
  • Deep-linking regressions force users into app store loops
  • Technical instability during account management prevents purchase completion
-
  • Recurring billing complaints indicate a high-friction subscription model
  • Inconsistent release calendar data reduces utility for power users
  • 1.86-star Android rating indicates significant technical instability
  • Static directory lacks personalized discovery tools found in modern retail apps
  • Stale store location data causes real-world friction for users
  • Navigation complexity post-update frustrates long-term users
-
Pricingfreefreemiumfreesubscriptionfreefreefreemiumfreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceActiveMaintenance-ActiveIntenseActiveActiveMaintenance-
Update Cadence2 versions, ~1d avg5 versions, ~9d avg2 versions, ~3d avg-5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions, ~5d avg1 versions-

Compare Scheels head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Scheels, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0