Report updated Jun 11, 2026
Score Count
For board and card game players requiring accurate, persistent score tracking for complex game sessions.
Score Count is a market-leading utilities app that is free with in-app purchases. With a 4.9/5 rating from 4.1K reviews, it delivers strong user satisfaction. Users particularly appreciate ad-free experience provides a clean and focused utility for tracking game scores, though in-app purchase prompts during gameplay interrupt the flow for users of the free version remains a common concern.
What is Score Count?
Score Count is a utility app for tracking board and card game scores on iOS and Android.
Users hire the app for distraction-free, persistent score tallying, but the current monetization flow creates a social cost that disrupts the game-night experience.
Current Momentum
v2.0 · 1d ago
Maintenance- Rewrote iOS app in SwiftUI.
- Modernized Android UI to Material 3.
- Added one-tap counter reset.
Active Nemesis
Fragmented niche
No dominant direct rival identified yet — see Other Rivals below.
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
UtilitiesNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
Recent User Mood
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
Loading...
What Are The Key Features?
Enforces strict turn order for score entry.
Removes the 5-player and 10-score limit.
Automatically saves game state to local storage.
How much does it cost?
- Free: 5 players, 10 scores, 2 saved games
- Remove Limits: Unlimited players, scores, saved games
- Extended Main Board: Sequential mode
Freemium model uses feature-gating on session capacity and advanced game modes to drive IAP conversion.
Who Built It?
Enrichment in progress
Publisher profile available very soon
What other apps does Marek Lenart make?
What do users think recently?
Low confidence · Latest 60 of 65 total reviews analyzed · Based on 65 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a thrilled sentiment. Users appreciate ad-free experience provides a clean and focused utility for tracking game scores, but report in-app purchase prompts during gameplay interrupt the flow for users of the free version.
What Users Love
What Frustrates Users
What Users Want
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for Score Count?
Where is it available?
Localized markets (12)
How's The Utilities Market?
Market outlook for this category
Available very soon
The rivals identified
Same space(4)
This app competes for the same tabletop gaming utility market by providing digital tools that replace physical game components.
Differentiators
- Features a shake-to-roll interaction that provides a more tactile, immersive experience than static score tracking.
- Offers deep customization of dice aesthetics, allowing users to personalize their digital gaming toolkit significantly.
Skorer is a direct functional competitor that focuses specifically on score management for board and card games.
Differentiators
- Includes a dedicated game notes feature that allows users to record specific session details or house rules.
- Provides a more robust customization suite for tracking complex scoring systems compared to the target app.
This app captures the same board game utility audience by focusing on the randomization and probability aspects of tabletop play.
Differentiators
- Boasts a massive user base with over 21,000 ratings, creating a significant social proof and discovery advantage.
- Supports advanced dice locking mechanics that allow for complex game strategies not possible in simple score trackers.
This app serves the broader board game enthusiast ecosystem, overlapping with score tracking as part of a comprehensive game management suite.
Differentiators
- Integrates a full database of board games, enabling users to track their entire physical game library.
- Automates translation and play session tracking, providing a more holistic utility for serious tabletop hobbyists.
New entrants(2)
While in a different category, it competes for the same 'utility' screen time by offering specialized tracking tools for outdoor enthusiasts.
Differentiators
- Utilizes AR camera sky guidance to provide real-time visual data, a high-tech feature absent in score trackers.
This newcomer targets the specific D&D and RPG segment of the tabletop market, competing for the same utility-focused user base.
Differentiators
- Implements physics-based 3D dice simulation that offers a visually superior and more realistic rolling experience.
Compare Score Count against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for Score Count
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Ad-free interface sustains high user satisfaction
- Autosave mechanism ensures session continuity
- Multi-language support enables broad international reach
Critical Frictions
- Premium tier gating interrupts gameplay flow
- Absence of round-by-round history limits utility
- 0.7★ rating gap between Android and iOS
Growth Levers
- Implement searchable player name database
- Add column-view for large group visibility
- Expand B2B reach through tabletop partnerships
Market Threats
- Skorer's feature-rich customization suite threatens retention
- Dice Roller's 21,000-rating social proof dominates discovery
- Demand for integrated game-management suites displaces utilities
What are the next best moves?
Pivot IAP prompts to post-game screens because mid-game interruptions trigger churn complaints → increase session retention
User sentiment data identifies mid-game IAP prompts as a top frustration theme.
Trade-off: Pause the development of the new player-name database — retention impact of current users outweighs new-user setup efficiency.
Ship round-by-round history because it is a top-requested feature to close the gap with Skorer → increase power-user stickiness
User requests for incremental score history are cited as a limitation for complex games.
Trade-off: Deprioritize the column-view layout update — history tracking is a higher-frequency utility need.
A counter-intuitive read
The app's high rating on Android is a vulnerability: maintenance-mode at the top of the category makes it more susceptible to a single live-ops rival than a lower-ranked app with room to grow.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Game notes (available in Skorer but absent here)
- Advanced scoring customization (available in Skorer but absent here)
- Physics-based 3D dice (available in Dice & Dragons but absent here)
Key Takeaways
Score Count wins on simplicity but risks losing power users to feature-rich rivals like Skorer, so the PM should prioritize round-by-round history to defend the core utility and move monetization to post-game to protect the ad-free experience.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
The tabletop utility market is consolidating around apps that offer comprehensive game management rather than simple counters. Score Count remains exposed to churn if it continues to gate basic usability behind mid-game prompts, so the PM must shift to a non-intrusive monetization model to sustain the current Android momentum.
The recent Material 3 update on Android shows active feature investment, which helps maintain the 4.9 rating baseline.
Intrusive IAP prompts during gameplay create a churn risk that directly undermines the app's primary ad-free value proposition.