Report updated Apr 17, 2026
Screen Mirroring ®
For casual users looking for a simple, hardware-free way to display mobile content on their Smart TVs for home entertainment or sharing.
Screen Mirroring ® is a challenged utilities app that is free with in-app purchases. With a 3.9/5 rating from 2.5K reviews, it faces significant user friction. Users particularly appreciate free access, though connection failures remains a common concern.
What is Screen Mirroring ®?
Current Momentum
v1.5 · 13mo ago
MaintenanceThe app is currently in maintenance mode, with no major feature updates identified in the provided history.
Active Nemesis
Screen Mirroring - TV Miracast
By Sooltr
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
UtilitiesNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
Recent User Mood
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
What Are The Key Features?
Mirror the phone screen to a Smart TV with zero delay
Cast photos and videos directly from the device's Camera Roll to the TV
Enables screen sharing without the need for additional cables or external hardware
Designed to work with a wide range of Smart TV brands
How much does it cost?
- Free version available
- In-app purchases for full feature access/ad removal
The app uses a standard utility freemium model, leveraging a free entry point to capture a large user base with monetization likely driven by IAPs.
Who Built It?
Zap Software Studio BV
Simplifying smart home connectivity by transforming mobile devices into universal remote controls. Providing seamless hardware-free screen mirroring for home entertainment users.
Portfolio
2
Apps
What other apps does Zap Software Studio BV make?
Explore the full Zap Software Studio BV report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Zap Software Studio BV.
What do users think recently?
High confidence · 49 reviews analyzed
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate free access, but report connection failures and performance issues.
Limited review volume (49 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for Screen Mirroring ®?
How's The Utilities Market?
Market outlook for this category
Available very soon
The rivals identified
The outtake for Screen Mirroring ®
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Universal TV Compatibility marketing
- Low-friction freemium entry point
- Established rating volume (2,494+)
Critical Frictions
- High frequency of connection and discovery failures
- Performance lag and black screen bugs
- Negative user perception of privacy policy
Growth Levers
- Improve UI to match Replica's superior onboarding
- Add productivity features like Whiteboard (Screen Mirroring Z)
- Implement private listening mode (Roku feature)
Market Threats
- DoCast's superior low-latency performance
- Replica's higher brand recognition and stability
- Native OS-level mirroring improvements
What are the next best moves?
Overhaul Device Discovery Protocol
Connection Failures is the #1 complaint theme (High frequency), directly causing the 'Upset' sentiment and high churn risk.
Optimize Latency and Audio Sync
Performance issues like 'black screens' and 'choppy audio' are medium-frequency complaints that invalidate the 'zero-delay' marketing claim.
Transparent Privacy Onboarding
Users explicitly cited privacy concerns as a reason to avoid downloading; a clearer explanation of data usage can improve conversion.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Web browser mirroring (available in Replica)
- Built-in whiteboard for real-time drawing (available in Screen Mirroring Z)
- Integrated IPTV support (available in Screen Mirroring Z)
- Private listening mode via mobile headphones (available in Roku)
Key Takeaways
If I were the PM, I would halt all new feature development to focus exclusively on connection reliability. The app's core differentiator (Universal Compatibility) is currently undermined by its inability to consistently find devices, leaving it vulnerable to more stable competitors like Replica and performance-focused newcomers like DoCast.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
v1.5.8 (Feb 2025) focused on stability, but user sentiment remains 'Upset' due to persistent connection issues.
High-frequency complaints regarding device discovery indicate the core value proposition is failing for a significant user segment.