Smiths Bible Dictionary vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Smiths Bible Dictionary's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperWatchdis Group B.VMobiSystemsMaria de los Llanos Goig MoninoSanta Biblia Libros Estudios Aplicaciones ReinAppsMaria de los Llanos Goig MoninoMaria de los Llanos Goig MoninoCristian PonceEstudios bíblicos, devocionales y TeologíaMorfosisCOPTIC ORTHODOX CHURCH ST MARK
CategoryReferenceBooks & ReferenceBookBooks & ReferenceBookBookReferenceBooks & ReferenceReferenceEducation
PlatformiOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.5 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count17113,276,41385182641337834328176
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 5, 2018Feb 12, 2019Oct 10, 2022Oct 19, 2022Dec 28, 2022Oct 7, 2022Apr 25, 2023Feb 6, 2017May 6, 2026Nov 11, 2016
Last UpdatedJun 23, 2025May 13, 2026Aug 21, 2025Sep 3, 2025Jun 20, 2024Jan 22, 2026Feb 1, 2026Mar 3, 2026May 19, 2026Aug 21, 2024
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedpositive--positive----excellent
Score40/10085/100--85/100----90/100
Praises
  • High quality reference material provides essential utility for professional religious study and research
  • Authoritative content quality
-------
  • Extensive library of sermons and hymns provides a central spiritual resource for daily study
Complaints
  • Aggressive advertisement frequency interrupts study sessions and degrades the overall user experience
  • Ineffective search functionality prevents users from locating specific content within the application
  • Trial limitation friction
-------
  • Audio messages at the beginning of sermons create friction during the listening experience
Requests-
  • Integrated scripture text
-------
  • Advanced playback features like autoplay and custom playlists would improve the listening experience
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Offline-first architecture reduces server dependency
  • 4,500+ subject database provides foundational utility
  • Oxford branding provides academic authority
  • Offline-first architecture ensures utility in low-connectivity
  • Advanced search tools reduce lookup friction
--
  • Offline-first architecture ensures consistent accessibility in low-connectivity environments
  • Catholic-specific theological context provides a niche differentiator against generic Bible dictionaries
----
  • Niche-specific content library functions as a retention moat
  • Subsplash B2B integration provides stable revenue foundation
Weaknesses
  • Aggressive ad-frequency degrades study sessions
  • Search utility fails to locate specific content
  • 40/100 sentiment score indicates high friction
  • 30-day trial gate limits acquisition
  • Lack of integrated scripture text forces app-switching
  • 0.47 rating gap between Android and iOS
--
  • Lack of audio playback features reduces daily active usage
  • No cloud-save or cross-device synchronization limits long-term user retention
----
  • Static media delivery lacks interactive engagement
  • Lack of dark mode causes recurring user friction
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefreemium
Momentum-Maintenance-MaintenanceZombie-Steady-IntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence-2 versions, ~195d avg-4 versions1 versions-5 versions-5 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~619d avg

Compare Smiths Bible Dictionary head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Smiths Bible Dictionary, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0