SplitIt: Group Bill Splitter vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against SplitIt: Group Bill Splitter's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

RVUcalc
Contender
Money Counter
Contender
hipay
Peer
Bushel
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperFeast Labs LLCDeeline Productions, LLCHolisiteMaurice CormanV PUGAZHENTHIV PUGAZHENTHIDollarbird Apps SRLHigh Payment Solutions LLCAL BILAD BANKBushel Farm, Inc.
CategoryFinanceFinanceToolsMedicalFinanceFinanceFinanceLifestyleFinanceBusiness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.8 / 51.0 / 52.9 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.1 / 53.1 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count7145,760514294393,466161202
PriceFreeFreeFree$3.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 1, 2024Mar 2, 2019Dec 4, 2019Jan 29, 2017Aug 8, 2024May 1, 2012Jul 31, 2017Oct 15, 2020Feb 12, 2025May 8, 2013
Last UpdatedJan 2, 2025Apr 13, 2026Sep 29, 2020Jan 29, 2017Apr 27, 2026May 7, 2026Apr 16, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 20, 2026May 4, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment---negative--negativemixed-negative
Score---35/100--25/10045/100-15/100
Praises---
  • Simplified calculation of patient visit billing codes aids in identifying potential undercoding of professional services
--
  • Calendar-based visual interface provides clarity for tracking income and expenses over time
  • Simple and straightforward interface design makes the application easy for daily utility tasks
-
  • Automated grain contract tracking provides significant time savings for farm business management
Complaints---
  • Lack of persistent storage causes total data loss when the application session resets or closes
  • Outdated medical coding data renders the tool ineffective for current professional billing requirements
--
  • Daily transaction limits force users into subscription plans against their preference
  • Unreliable data synchronization and transaction loss erode trust in financial accuracy
  • Frequent application freezing and forced closures disrupt the user experience during critical transactions
-
  • Aggressive paywall implementation locks previously free essential features behind high monthly subscription costs
Requests---
  • Export functionality for spreadsheet integration would allow for better tracking of weekly billing totals
--
  • One-time purchase model preferred over recurring monthly subscription fees
  • Email-based account registration to support users without local mobile phone numbers
-
  • Tiered pricing models based on acreage or usage to accommodate smaller farming operations
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Receipt-scanning automation reduces manual entry friction compared to standard calculators
  • Specialized military-specific pension logic functions as a high-trust barrier against generic financial calculators.
  • Manual calculation logic provides high-intent utility for users wary of linking bank accounts to third-party apps
  • Niche focus on physician compensation transparency
--
  • Calendar-first UX reduces cognitive load for non-accountants
  • Collaborative features create a direct conversion path for household budgeting
  • U-money integration creates high-frequency utility loop
  • E-Barimt automation reduces tax compliance friction
  • Deep integration with local Saudi payment infrastructure functions as a B2B distribution barrier.
  • Direct access to Enjaz and Western Union networks provides a high-utility remittance moat.
  • Automated data sync with John Deere Operations Center reduces manual entry friction
  • Granular data permission controls build trust for B2B record sharing
Weaknesses
  • Zero monetization model limits capital for feature development
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Retirement models are anchored to 2021 data, creating a potential accuracy gap for users planning beyond the current fiscal year.
  • Total lack of automated transaction syncing forces manual entry, creating high friction for users with multiple credit lines
  • Total data loss on session reset
  • Database values not updated since 2017
--
  • Sync failures erode trust in financial accuracy
  • Restrictive free-tier transaction limits trigger immediate churn
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Frequent freezing during payment flows
  • 0.69★ rating gap between iOS and Android
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates inconsistent performance across platforms.
  • Lack of privacy-centric interface features creates a competitive disadvantage against privacy-focused rivals.
  • High-cost subscription model alienates long-term users
  • Inaccurate rainfall data reporting undermines core utility trust
  • Technical instability causes frequent app crashes
Pricingfreefreefreepaidfreemiumfreesubscriptionfreefreefreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenance----ActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~416d avg1 versions----5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~8d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~10d avg

Compare SplitIt: Group Bill Splitter head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by SplitIt: Group Bill Splitter, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0