Starbucks Indonesia vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Starbucks Indonesia's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Brewly
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperLunaria Labs LTDPacific Coffee Company LimitedCRM.COM LtdPT Fore Kopi IndonesiaThe Coffee Bean & Tea LeafPhilz CoffeeJoe Coffee CompanyTheodore HopkinsBrewly
CategoryLifestyleFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkUtilitiesFood & Drink
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating3.0 / 51.0 / 54.0 / 54.5 / 52.8 / 52.1 / 54.8 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count411321,6161431,13600
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 10, 2023May 31, 2011Dec 10, 2019Oct 13, 2018Sep 27, 2016Feb 12, 2018Sep 7, 2020Apr 8, 2026Mar 26, 2026
Last UpdatedOct 22, 2025Nov 4, 2025Feb 10, 2026Apr 27, 2026Mar 30, 2026Mar 25, 2026May 5, 2026Apr 9, 2026May 1, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixednegativeterrible-terriblenegative---
Score50/10025/10015/100-15/10020/100---
Praises
  • Convenience of mobile ordering for skipping physical queues.
-
  • High quality service experiences at specific physical locations keep loyal customers returning despite app issues
-
  • High quality drink flavor profiles keep loyal customers returning to physical store locations
----
Complaints
  • Technical friction during the top-up process and perceived complexity of the star-based reward system.
  • Lack of mobile ordering
  • Authentication failures during registration prevent new users from accessing loyalty points and digital offers
  • Application instability and frequent crashes disrupt the ordering process for mobile loyalty members
-
  • Account registration and login failures prevent users from accessing the digital ordering platform
  • Payment processing errors and forced gift card reloads create significant friction during checkout
  • Technical instability in the ordering flow
---
Requests-
  • Mobile order and pay
--
  • Integration with third-party delivery services to enable points accumulation and order tracking
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Global loyalty infrastructure driving user trust
  • Integrated m-banking top-up for local payment habits
  • Established physical retail footprint in Hong Kong
  • Birthday surprise mechanism drives repeat visits
  • Simplified cashback model provides immediate, easy-to-understand value to casual users
  • Tech-first retail model reduces physical wait times [Market: Indonesia]
  • Agile customization engine allows rapid menu iteration [Segment: Urban commuters]
  • Established global brand heritage provides a premium perception that local competitors often lack.
  • "Cup of Love" brand identity drives emotional connection
  • Granular customization engine differentiates from mass-market chains
  • Tiered loyalty thresholds create clear spending targets for high-value customers
  • Premium brand perception sustains organic install velocity in the NYC market
  • Specialized technical parameter tracking for roasting
  • Focused interface for data-driven hobbyists
  • Zero-friction entry via free model
  • Subscription model provides predictable recurring revenue
  • Gamified loyalty tiers encourage long-term user retention
Weaknesses
  • 3.65-star rating indicates persistent UX friction
  • Complex reward conversion logic
  • Lack of social gifting features
  • 1.25★ Android rating indicates severe UX friction
  • No mobile-order capability
  • Manual top-up processes
  • Authentication failures during registration block new user onboarding
  • Frequent crashes disrupt the wallet access flow
  • No cloud-save or cross-platform loyalty sync [Metric: 82,764 total ratings]
  • Premium tier pricing lacks digital-only value [Pricing: Free-only model]
  • 0.3★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Persistent login errors block primary utility
  • 2.0★ average rating across platforms
  • High technical friction in the ordering flow
  • Lack of gamified loyalty incentives
  • Android-iOS rating gap (3.9 vs 4.8) indicates platform-specific technical friction
  • Lack of advanced beverage customization limits appeal to specialty enthusiasts
  • No community feedback loops
  • Manual data entry requirement
  • Lack of automated timing or sensor integration
  • No mobile order-ahead capability
  • Manual redemption process creates barista friction
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefreesubscription
Momentum-MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence-2 versions, ~7d avg2 versions, ~5d avg2 versions, ~3d avg2 versions, ~5d avg5 versions2 versions, ~0d avg1 versions2 versions, ~10d avg

Compare Starbucks Indonesia head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Starbucks Indonesia, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0