Sulpak vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Sulpak's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Sulpak
This App
Quince
Peer
Mejuri
Peer
Hiquotroca
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperArena SLastbrand IncUrban LadderKoupon Inc.MejuriDestinyCloudlovyino ltd
CategoryShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingBusiness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.3 / 54.9 / 53.7 / 54.9 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count155,9006517,59760300
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 9, 2022Mar 2, 2025Jan 29, 2015Nov 29, 2023Sep 12, 2023May 13, 2026Feb 25, 2026
Last UpdatedMay 25, 2026May 15, 2026Mar 23, 2026Jun 26, 2026May 12, 2026May 15, 2026Mar 28, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-positiveterrible-positive--
Score-75/10015/100-85/100--
Praises-
  • High product quality and material standards drive strong customer satisfaction across clothing and home categories
  • High quality furniture collections and finishing provide aesthetic value for home interior design enthusiasts
----
Complaints-
  • Deep-linking issues force users into the app store instead of opening specific product pages
  • Systemic failure in after sales support and installation coordination causes significant customer frustration
----
Requests-
  • Implementation of a meaningful rewards program to incentivize referrals and user-generated content
  • Navigation fix to prevent the back button from closing the application unexpectedly during browsing
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • QR scanner bridges physical store inventory with digital checkout
  • Instant installment approval reduces friction for high-ticket electronics purchases
  • Factory-direct model captures margins to sustain lower price points
  • 365-day return policy functions as a primary conversion barrier
  • Omnichannel bridge via walk-in store locator
  • Modular customization for high-ticket interior design
  • 0% EMI financing lowers purchase barriers
  • Automated minute-by-minute code validation ensures high functional accuracy
  • Real-time deal pattern analysis filters out non-performing offers
  • Direct-to-consumer model ensures consistent brand-led quality control
  • Piercing Studio booking creates a physical-to-digital retail bridge
-
  • Verified account protocol establishes a trust baseline for private sellers
Weaknesses
  • 3.5-star Android rating indicates significant technical instability
  • 0.7-star rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Deep-linking regressions force users into app store loops
  • Technical instability during account management prevents purchase completion
  • Systemic after-sales support failure
  • UI regressions blocking profile navigation
  • Inconsistent delivery timelines eroding brand trust
  • No proprietary loyalty program to drive repeat usage
  • Affiliate-only revenue model limits long-term user retention
  • Low review volume (603 ratings) limits social proof
  • Lack of third-party authentication services for secondary market goods
-
  • Zero rating count on iOS platform indicates lack of initial market traction
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefree
MomentumActiveActiveMaintenanceActiveMaintenance-Maintenance
Update Cadence5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg2 versions, ~2d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~10d avg1 versions-1 versions

Compare Sulpak head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Sulpak, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0