Telehealthy vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Telehealthy's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Telehealthy
This App
Core Identity
DeveloperAmerican WellSimplePractice, LLC.TalkiatryNorthwell Health INCFlexCare, LLCCerebral Inc.eTherapists GmbHCareFirst, Inc.GroundGameHealthPatientsLikeMe
CategoryMedicalMedicalMedicalMedicalHealth & FitnessMedicalHealth & FitnessMedicalHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating3.0 / 54.8 / 53.2 / 54.9 / 53.5 / 54.6 / 52.1 / 54.8 / 53.7 / 54.2 / 5
Ratings Count2359,9561564232,11079318
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 17, 2017May 24, 2018Feb 9, 2026Oct 12, 2025Jan 12, 2021Dec 11, 2020May 23, 2016Nov 26, 2025Nov 18, 2025Mar 13, 2023
Last UpdatedJan 11, 2025May 11, 2026Apr 29, 2026May 12, 2026Apr 28, 2025Mar 16, 2026May 12, 2026Apr 13, 2026Mar 4, 2026Apr 21, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedpositiveterriblepositivenegativenegativenegative-mixednegative
Score50/10075/10025/10085/10030/10025/10030/100-50/10035/100
Praises
  • Ease of use
  • Convenient telehealth access allows patients to attend therapy sessions from their own homes
  • Initial clinical interactions provide effective medication management and symptom relief for new patients
-
  • Service Breadth
  • Professional and empathetic care from individual practitioners keeps patients engaged with the service
---
  • Community health sharing features provide comfort to users managing multiple chronic conditions
Complaints-
  • Forced disconnection occurs when users navigate away from the app to check calendars
  • Aggressive and irregular billing practices create significant financial friction for users post-appointment
  • Unreliable appointment scheduling and frequent cancellations disrupt the continuity of mental health care
-
  • Android Stability
  • Persistent application launch failures and freezing screens prevent users from accessing critical mental health care
  • Technical friction and rewards redemption issues
--
  • Frequent application crashes and freezing behavior prevent consistent access to health community groups
  • Unexplained account lockouts and session timeouts cause significant data loss during comment composition
Requests-
  • Background multitasking support allows users to access other apps without closing the session
--------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Accreditation by The American Telemedicine Association sustains brand trust
  • Apple Health integration provides a data-sharing mechanism for clinical context
  • One-click connection mechanism reduces patient-side technical friction
  • HIPAA-compliant video architecture functions as a B2B distribution barrier
  • In-network insurance verification reduces financial barriers to entry
  • Clinician-matching algorithm improves initial patient-provider fit
  • Unified health record linking virtual and in-person care
  • Dedicated concierge team for system navigation
  • Multi-specialty service breadth (TeleSpine/TeleDentistry) creates a wider clinical scope than generalist urgent care apps.
  • Vertical pharmacy integration increases switching costs
  • Standardized 10-week clinical methodology ensures treatment consistency
  • B2B distribution model secures enterprise-wide user access
  • Gamified reward mechanism drives daily activity tracking
-
  • Implify platform facilitates multi-party health plan and provider coordination
  • B2B contract model secures distribution through managed care organizations
  • B2B revenue model via 80+ research partnerships
  • Longitudinal data collection creates high switching costs
Weaknesses
  • 3.0-star rating indicates user experience friction
  • Lack of clinician-efficiency tools drives provider churn
  • Forced disconnection on screen-switching disrupts clinical workflow
  • Video quality degradation persists in longer sessions
  • High out-of-pocket costs contradict initial insurance verification
  • 0.49★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • 0.49★ Android-iOS rating gap
  • Limited service scope compared to multi-specialty telehealth rivals
  • 1.86★ Android rating indicates critical stability issues that drive churn before the first consultation.
  • Persistent app launch failures and freezing screens
  • Opaque billing practices causing financial distress
  • 2.1-star rating on iOS signals poor UX
  • Lack of clinical-grade health management limits enterprise value
-
  • 3.67-star rating on iOS indicates early-stage UX friction
  • Zero Android review activity suggests low user adoption outside of pilot programs
  • High crash frequency during navigation
  • Session timeouts cause significant data loss
  • 0.5★ rating gap between iOS and Android
Pricingfreesubscriptionfreefreesubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumfreefreefree
Momentum-MaintenanceMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-MaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence-5 versions, ~59d avg2 versions, ~0d avg5 versions, ~6d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~129d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~1d avg-2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~2d avg2 versions, ~22d avg

Compare Telehealthy head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Telehealthy, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0