| Core Identity |
| Developer | Userlytics Corporation | Userbrain GmbH | dscout | Survey Junkie | Fiverr International Ltd. |
| Category | Business | Productivity | Lifestyle | Lifestyle | Business |
| Platform | Android, iOS | iOS, Android | Android, iOS | Android, iOS | Android, iOS |
| Store Metrics |
| Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 2.0 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 | 4.9 / 5 |
| Ratings Count | 2,927 | 1 | 3,577 | 85,296 | 563,917 |
| Price | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Release Date | Nov 17, 2018 | Dec 3, 2014 | Oct 7, 2010 | May 10, 2019 | Dec 11, 2011 |
| Last Updated | May 13, 2026 | Apr 10, 2026 | Apr 11, 2026 | Apr 9, 2026 | May 6, 2026 |
| Sentiment & Reviews |
| Sentiment | mixed | negative | - | negative | mixed |
| Score | 55/100 | 25/100 | - | 35/100 | 45/100 |
| Praises | - Direct payment for survey completion provides a reliable source of extra income for active users
| - The core concept of providing feedback through recorded tests remains an enjoyable experience for users
| - | - Direct cash payouts via PayPal and bank transfers provide tangible financial rewards for active users
| - Access to diverse professional talent across multiple creative and technical service categories
|
| Complaints | - Frequent application crashes and recording failures during active tests result in lost time and earnings
| - Persistent upload failures during test submission cause significant frustration and loss of potential earnings for testers
- Technical barriers including screen recording failures and microphone access errors prevent users from starting tests
| - | - Frequent disqualifications after completing long surveys waste user time and erode trust in the platform
| - Prevalence of phishing and scam messages targeting new sellers in the inbox
|
| Requests | - Transparency regarding survey duration and compensation before starting tasks would improve user trust
| - Testers request a transparent dashboard to view compensation status and expected earnings for completed studies
| - | - Improved transparency regarding survey qualification criteria to prevent wasted time on ineligible tasks
| - Improved tablet interface to utilize screen space beyond the mobile layout
|
| Strategic Intel |
| Strengths | - 2-million-tester panel functions as a B2B distribution barrier
- AI-driven analysis justifies enterprise-tier pricing
- Branching study logic enables complex research contracts
| - Session-only recording mechanism lowers privacy-related entry barriers for new testers
| - | - $5 cash-out threshold lowers barrier to entry for casual users
| - Service-catalog UX enables friction-free purchasing
- Global talent pool provides 24/7/365 project delivery
- AI-matching reduces time-to-hire for buyers
|
| Weaknesses | - Frequent recording crashes during active tests
- High survey disqualification rates
- 0.1★ rating gap between iOS and Android
| - 2.0 rating on iOS indicates critical failure in core recording functionality
- High-frequency upload failures drive tester churn
| - | - High disqualification rate after survey completion erodes trust
| - High volume of phishing/scam messages in inbox
- Opaque account moderation policies
- Notification delivery failures on mobile
|
| Pricing | freemium | free | free | free | freemium |
| Momentum | Maintenance | Maintenance | Intense | Maintenance | Active |
| Update Cadence | 2 versions, ~42d avg | 2 versions, ~63d avg | 5 versions | 3 versions, ~19d avg | 5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~14d avg |
