MARLVEL

ZoomShift Employee Scheduling vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against ZoomShift Employee Scheduling's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

ZoomShift Employee Scheduling
This App
Workforce.com
Nemesis
ScheduleFlex by Shiftboard
Nemesis
OptimoRoute Driver
Contender
FieldPulse
Contender
Skedulo Plus
Contender
mHelpDesk
Contender
CosmoLex
Contender
Field Squared
Contender
Guusto - Recognition & Rewards
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperZoomShiftTandaShiftboard, Inc.OptimoRoute Inc.Flicent IncSkedulomHelpdesk, LLCCosmolex LLCField Squared, Inc.Guusto Gifts Inc.
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusiness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating2.8 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 53.2 / 54.0 / 52.8 / 53.5 / 52.8 / 52.1 / 54.0 / 5
Ratings Count602,96615,4052511237197122645
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 1, 2015Dec 22, 2017Dec 20, 2009Oct 6, 2017Jul 20, 2021Sep 24, 2023Jun 7, 2016Jun 21, 2017Mar 14, 2014Feb 19, 2014
Last UpdatedApr 8, 2025May 12, 2026Mar 26, 2026May 7, 2026Apr 22, 2026Mar 16, 2026Jan 27, 2026Oct 6, 2022Nov 5, 2025May 5, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativepositive-mixed----terrible-
Score35/10085/100-50/100----15/100-
Praises
  • Simple and straightforward time tracking interface helps employees manage their daily work schedules effectively
  • Centralized mobile access for shifts and leave requests
-
  • Route planning efficiency
----
  • Early adopters expressed initial excitement for the platform potential during the initial rollout phase
-
Complaints
  • Mandatory location services and GPS tracking requirements create friction for employees clocking in and out
  • Frequent application crashes and freezing issues prevent staff from successfully recording their work hours
  • Interface complexity for frontline workers
-
  • Mid-day plan change friction
----
  • Frequent application crashes and data loss during active work sessions disrupt professional field operations
  • Inconsistent synchronization and connectivity errors prevent access to assigned work orders in the field
-
Requests
  • Two-factor authentication or biometric security requested to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive work data
-------
  • Improved offline functionality and reliable local data storage to prevent loss during connectivity drops
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Labor forecasting engine reduces overhead for retail managers
  • Centralized communication loop drives daily active habit
  • Automated award interpretation functions as a B2B distribution barrier into high-compliance sectors
  • Enterprise-grade labor cost forecasting drives high-value subscription retention
  • Mobile-first UX optimized for shift-based communication
  • Real-time notification responsiveness for schedule changes
  • Algorithmic route planning functions as a B2B efficiency moat for logistics operations
  • Specialized job-scheduling workflows for service contractors
  • Guided data collection via ClearPath tool
  • Tiered subscription model aligned with contractor growth
  • Template-powered framework enables custom B2B workflow adaptation
  • Offline-first architecture ensures data integrity in remote field environments
  • Offline-first synchronization architecture allows field operations in low-connectivity environments
  • 10+ years of domain-specific focus on trade business workflows
  • Integrated IOLTA accounting functions as a B2B distribution barrier
  • Workflow engine enables complex process automation without custom code
  • Offline-first architecture supports remote utility infrastructure
  • Hierarchical asset registry creates deep operational lock-in
  • Markup-free reward redemption model builds employee trust
  • SMS/QR delivery mechanism captures non-desk workforce segments
  • Social impact integration aligns with enterprise ESG mandates
Weaknesses
  • 0.8★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates poor platform parity
  • Mandatory GPS requirement triggers high-frequency user complaints
  • 0.58-star rating gap between iOS and Android platforms indicates inconsistent mobile performance
  • Enterprise-heavy feature set creates onboarding friction for non-desk employees
  • No biometric security protocols for time-clock verification
  • Gated access model limits organic growth
  • 3.24-star rating on iOS indicates driver-facing UX friction
  • Missing native payroll and payment processing
  • 0.75-star rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • High administrative friction compared to integrated financial platforms
  • Closed-access invitation model restricts user acquisition
  • Low rating count (93 total) indicates limited public-facing feedback loop
  • 1.5★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Manual invoicing processes lack automated payment reminder sequences
  • 2.75-star Android rating indicates significant mobile UX friction
  • 2.1-star rating indicates severe stability issues
  • Frequent data loss during active work sessions
  • Excessive background GPS battery drain
  • Lacks automated compliance rules engine for enterprise
  • No integrated shift-swapping or scheduling tools
  • Limited HRIS and payroll system connectivity
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionpaidsubscriptionsubscriptionunknownfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~163d avg3 versions, ~35d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg2 versions, ~5d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~20d avg2 versions, ~13d avg2 versions, ~1285d avg2 versions, ~166d avg1 versions

Compare ZoomShift Employee Scheduling head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ZoomShift Employee Scheduling, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0