EXARING AG
Snapshot
Publisher DNA
What defines EXARING AG?
AI intelligence is not yet available for EXARING AG. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does EXARING AG ship?
Apps
2 apps analysed
Analysis in progress
Watch TV on all devices: Over 300 HD channels, 70+ pay-TV channels & recordings
Hardware integration via Stick and Box creates viewing lock-in
- The extensive channel selection and media library provide consistent entertainment options for the entire family
- Frequent playback interruptions and black screens during channel switching degrade the core television viewing experience
Single-market publisher, every app ships only to United States.
Based on 2 of 2 apps with localized market data · last scanned .
Americas (1)
- United States2 / 2
Core markets (2/2 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
0
Positive apps
0
Neutral / mixed
1
Negative apps
35/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does EXARING AG compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
Tubi competes by offering a zero-cost, ad-supported alternative to the subscription-based live television model of waipu.tv, capturing price-sensitive viewers who prioritize free access over premium cloud recording features.
Contenders(10)
Both apps target users seeking live television streaming, but IPTV Smart Player competes by allowing users to import their own M3U playlists, bypassing the proprietary subscription model of waipu.tv.
Both apps compete for the same live-TV streaming audience by replacing traditional broadcast hardware with digital, multi-device platforms.
Both services target cord-cutters by replacing traditional cable hardware with live streaming, though they operate in distinct geographic markets.
Both apps compete for the same live television audience by providing multi-device access to linear channels and on-demand content. They overlap directly in the market for cable-free streaming services.
Both services compete for household entertainment time by providing multi-device access to linear television content and original programming. They overlap in their core objective of replacing traditional broadcast hardware with app-based streaming.
Both services provide live television streaming as a primary cable replacement, competing for the same household entertainment budget despite geographic market differences.
Both services provide live television streaming as a replacement for traditional cable hardware, targeting users who prioritize multi-device access to entertainment. They compete for the same household budget by offering channel bundles that eliminate the need for physical set-top boxes.
Both apps compete for live-television viewing time by providing grid-based channel guides and on-demand libraries, forcing users to choose between a paid, ad-free experience and a free, ad-supported model.
Both services compete for the German live-TV streaming audience, with Joyn utilizing a freemium model that directly challenges the subscription-only focus of waipu.tv.
ZDF competes for the German live-TV streaming audience by providing free on-demand content and offline viewing capabilities that directly address gaps in the waipu.tv subscription model.
Same space(6)
This app provides a DIY streaming interface for users who prefer managing their own playlist sources over a subscription-based service.
This service competes for the same cable-replacement audience by bundling live television with on-demand content and unlimited DVR storage.
This platform acts as a discovery layer for users navigating fragmented streaming services, including those like waipu.tv.
This app offers a multi-device playback solution for users who possess their own legal M3U playlist links.
This app functions as a technical alternative for users who manage their own M3U and M3U8 playlist content rather than relying on a managed service provider.
This app targets the same casual viewing demographic with a free, ad-supported model focused on proprietary British content.