Hoop app
Hoop - Make new friends
Publisher DNA
What defines Hoop app?
AI intelligence is not yet available for Hoop app. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does Hoop app ship?
Apps
1 app analysed
Integration with external social platforms simplifies the process of moving conversations off the app
- The core social connection loop provides an effective way for users to meet new friends globally
- Aggressive monetization and high costs for basic interactions frustrate users who prefer a free experience
Distributed across 19 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 1 of 1 app with localized market data · last scanned .
Americas (4)
- Brazil1 / 1
- Canada1 / 1
- Mexico1 / 1
- United States1 / 1
Europe (9)
- France1 / 1
- Germany1 / 1
- Italy1 / 1
- Netherlands1 / 1
- Portugal1 / 1
›+4 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 1
- Sweden1 / 1
- Turkey1 / 1
- United Kingdom1 / 1
Asia-Pacific (6)
- Australia1 / 1
- India1 / 1
- Indonesia1 / 1
- Singapore1 / 1
- South Korea1 / 1
›+1 more asia-pacific market
- Vietnam1 / 1
Core markets (1/1 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
0
Positive apps
1
Neutral / mixed
0
Negative apps
45/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does Hoop app compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(2)
Users report: Both apps compete for social discovery time, with Hoop targeting global teen connections and Meetup focusing on local interest-based networking.
Directly competes for the same 'make new friends' audience with a massive, established user base and high-frequency release cadence.
Contenders(7)
Both apps target friendship discovery, but Amigos focuses on local, activity-based meetups via maps, while Hoop relies on global, profile-based matching and external social handles.
Both apps target users seeking social discovery and friendship through profile-based matching and freemium monetization models.
Tagged serves the same social networking audience by combining live streaming with interactive games.
Both apps compete for the friendship discovery market, but they diverge on the mechanism of connection: Hoop uses global profile matching while Knockk centers on local, activity-based outings.
Users report: Monkey competes by offering native video and text chat, which directly addresses the primary user request for Hoop to add integrated messaging. Both apps target the same teen and young adult demographic seeking global social discovery.
Users report: Both apps target the social discovery market for young users, but NiceYo provides native voice-based interaction while Hoop relies on external social platforms for communication.
Yubo competes for the same teen and young adult demographic by offering a swipe-based discovery mechanism that directly overlaps with the core profile-matching loop of Hoop.
Same space(23)
Dominant live-streaming platform that captures the attention of users seeking real-time social interaction and discovery.
Blink provides a persistent social connection layer through real-time location tracking rather than discovery.
CLIQ serves the same social networking audience by focusing on interest-based communities and local events.
Litmatch provides an alternative social discovery path through 1-to-1 and group chat features.
Duet competes for the same social discovery market by automating the transition from app to real-life meeting.
Frimake targets the same social discovery audience by focusing on organizing real-world group activities.
Roost Social competes for user attention by replacing instant messaging with a slow-paced, map-based delivery system.
A massive social networking alternative that leverages existing graph data to facilitate rapid connection and conversation.
Hugi addresses the same social networking need by providing built-in conversation starters to reduce friction.
Knuddels provides a long-standing community chat alternative for users seeking group interaction.
Chatta competes for the same social discovery time by offering live voice rooms instead of profile-based matching.
MeYo addresses the same social discovery need by using AI-driven matching to reduce wait times.
Users report: Yay! targets the same teen and student demographic through interest-based group circles.
Adjacent social networking app that uses 3D avatars to facilitate connection, appealing to a younger, identity-focused demographic.
BeFriend targets the same local social networking space by combining profile swiping with video calling.
Piik provides a passive social connection layer by sharing status updates automatically on the home screen.
Vibe competes for the same user base by providing personalized dating suggestions based on values.
Uses synchronous multiplayer gaming as the primary bridge for making new friends, serving the same social intent.
Lumi targets the same social discovery audience by using smart algorithms to match users based on interests.
Echo serves the same social discovery market by offering anonymous interaction and secret sharing.
Slowly offers a contrasting social experience by prioritizing intentional, delayed correspondence over instant discovery.
Users report: BeReal captures the same teen demographic by replacing profile discovery with a daily spontaneous photo-sharing event.
WeLive targets the same global connection market using 1-on-1 video chat as the primary interaction method.
New entrants(2)
Rapidly growing social utility that uses home screen widgets to facilitate intimate, daily photo sharing between close friends.
Emerging social platform that uses fandom and artist-fan interaction as the primary driver for community building.
