MARLVEL

Absorb Learning vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Absorb Learning's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Absorb Learning
This App
360Learning
Nemesis
Gupy EduCorp
Contender
Go.Learn
Contender
Lafschool
Contender
Modern Handwriting Calligraphy
Contender
myViewBoard
Peer
Swivl M2
Peer
Tayo Coloring & Games
Peer
Cocobi Coloring & Games
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperAbsorb Software Inc.360LearningEducation For All LtdaDocebo SpaUNA Soluzione S.r.l.SPRINNETViewSonic CorporationSwivl, IncKIGLE Inc.KIGLE Inc.
CategoryEducationEducationEducationBusinessEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducation
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSAndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating2.3 / 54.9 / 53.0 / 52.2 / 51.0 / 54.3 / 53.7 / 54.3 / 55.0 / 54.4 / 5
Ratings Count126,325145223966,828628
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 28, 2019Feb 17, 2016May 6, 2019Aug 4, 2018Apr 11, 2020Aug 2, 2022Mar 4, 2019Dec 13, 2023Oct 18, 2022Sep 1, 2022
Last UpdatedMar 5, 2026Apr 23, 2026Apr 27, 2026Apr 29, 2026May 14, 2026Feb 7, 2026Apr 5, 2026Apr 24, 2026Nov 5, 2025Nov 5, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedpositive-------mixed
Score50/10085/100-------50/100
Praises
  • Direct access to corporate learning catalogs
  • Collaborative learning features
-------
  • Variety of activities and character-based content
Complaints
  • Navigation friction and lack of engagement
  • Mobile navigation complexity
-------
  • Ad-heavy experience and performance issues
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Enterprise-grade SSO integration reduces IT deployment friction
  • PCI-compliant eCommerce enables direct monetization of external partner training
  • AI-powered course builder reduces content production bottlenecks for enterprise clients
  • Peer-to-peer learning tools drive higher engagement than static LMS platforms
  • Gamified engagement mechanics drive completion rates in corporate environments
  • Gated access model maintains strict B2B data privacy
  • User-generated content upload enables peer-to-peer knowledge exchange
  • Offline learning supports enterprise mobility requirements
----
  • Licensed character IP drives immediate brand recognition
  • Multi-modal activities increase session variety
  • Global IP integration drives organic discovery
  • Multi-activity suite provides cognitive variety
Weaknesses
  • 2.25 iOS rating indicates significant UX friction
  • Lack of native gamification results in passive usage patterns
  • Demo-gated pricing creates a high-friction entry funnel
  • Mobile interface navigation complexity triggers user complaints
  • 0-rating on Android indicates critical stability or adoption failure
  • Manual quiz-based content creation lacks AI-assisted scalability
  • 2.2★ iOS rating indicates severe UX friction
  • Mobile feature parity with desktop is low
----
  • Ad-supported monetization model creates parental friction
  • Lack of ad-free subscription tier limits conversion
  • Ad-supported model creates safety friction
  • 3.5-star Android rating indicates performance instability
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreesubscriptionfreefreefreemiumfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-Intense---MaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~14d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg2 versions, ~2d avg-5 versions---2 versions, ~62d avg2 versions, ~62d avg

Compare Absorb Learning head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Absorb Learning, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0