| Core Identity |
| Developer | Agworld Pty Ltd | Field Margin Ltd | Corteva, Inc. | Syngenta Digital LTDA | Telus Ag and Consumer Goods | Pasturemap Inc. | EOS DATA ANALYTICS, INC. | Syngenta Digital LTDA | The Climate Corporation - US | Herdwatch Ltd |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Business | Business | Productivity | Business | Business | Business | Productivity | Productivity |
| Platform | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Store Metrics |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 | 0.0 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Ratings Count | 215 | 99 | 0 | 10 | 43 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 170 | 18 |
| Price | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Release Date | Nov 8, 2013 | Jan 26, 2017 | Apr 8, 2026 | Dec 6, 2021 | Oct 26, 2013 | Aug 24, 2023 | Feb 13, 2020 | Oct 7, 2014 | Feb 17, 2012 | Sep 6, 2022 |
| Last Updated | Mar 20, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 | May 6, 2026 | Apr 14, 2026 | Jan 9, 2025 | Apr 28, 2026 | Mar 2, 2026 | May 6, 2026 | Apr 15, 2026 | Apr 7, 2026 |
| Sentiment & Reviews |
| Sentiment | mixed | mixed | - | - | mixed | negative | mixed | - | mixed | mixed |
| Score | 45/100 | 60/100 | - | - | 45/100 | 30/100 | 65/100 | - | 45/100 | 50/100 |
| Praises | - Accurate crop management documentation provides reliable records for agricultural operations
| | - | - | - Grid soil sampling functionality provides significant operational efficiency for large scale agricultural land management
| - Map overview functionality provides clear visibility into rest days for pasture management
| - Satellite imagery tools provide rare management options for agricultural and aerospace product monitoring
- High resolution daily weather data improves forecasting accuracy for agricultural planning needs
| - | - Data visualization tools provide actionable insights for field management and hybrid selection decisions
- Cross-platform hardware compatibility allows farmers to monitor diverse machinery brands in one place
| - Specialized livestock focus
|
| Complaints | - Complex harvest input workflows increase time spent on manual data entry
| | - | - | - Frequent application crashes during data entry cycles disrupt critical field scouting and sampling workflows
| - Navigation and editing complexity in the latest version hinders core pasture management workflows
| - Map graphics quality and refresh failures prevent effective field mapping during zoomed sessions
- Limited spatial resolution coverage creates challenges for monitoring specific small scale field areas
| - | - Inaccurate acre counting and field mapping data erode trust in the platform for operational planning
- Subscription requirements for basic data access create friction for long-term agricultural users
| |
| Requests | - Integrated hardware scanning and image capture tools for faster product entry
| | - | - | - Visual field mapping improvements to match specific agricultural technology color coding standards
| - Search functionality for gates and fencers is required to improve navigation efficiency
| - | - | - Customizable color palettes for maps are required to support colorblind users in field analysis
| - Interactive field mapping
|
| Strategic Intel |
| Strengths | - Audit-ready database structure ensures regulatory compliance
- Collaborative platform design creates stakeholder network effects
| - Unlimited team access drives B2B network effects
- John Deere integration creates high switching costs
| - Proprietary agronomic research data informs high-accuracy field planning.
- Multi-brand machinery integration creates a high-utility data hub.
| - Syngenta-backed data integration provides deep financial ROI views
- Regulatory reporting module automates compliance for large-scale operations
| - agX Platform integration creates high switching costs for enterprise-level agronomists
- Offline-first architecture ensures utility in remote, low-connectivity agricultural zones
| - Offline GPS mapping ensures utility in remote field environments
- Grazing charting functions as a paid-tier gate for Pro subscribers
| - Multispectral satellite imagery functions as a B2B distribution barrier into insurance partnerships
- John Deere integration secures enterprise-level retention for large-scale farms
| - GPS machinery integration provides a unified view of field health and operational costs
- Offline scouting functionality ensures data capture in remote agricultural zones
| - Proprietary hardware-software integration creates high switching costs
- Cross-platform machinery compatibility aggregates diverse fleet data
| - 10 years of R&D provides a mature compliance-ready feature set
- EID hardware integration creates a high switching cost
- Multi-species support captures diversified farm operations
|
| Weaknesses | - Complex harvest input workflows increase manual entry time
- Synchronization delays disrupt field operations
| - Offline sync reliability issues
- Lack of automated regulatory reporting
- High Pro-tier pricing relative to manual-entry utility
| - Zero-revenue model lacks a direct path to self-sustaining product development.
- UI accessibility lags behind visual-first competitors like fieldmargin.
| - Gated AgriEdge partnership restricts user acquisition
- 10 total ratings indicate low platform visibility
- Lacks native equipment-telemetry integration
| - Frequent application crashes during data entry cycles
- 3.51-star rating indicates professional reliability concerns
- Sync failures prevent consistent data sharing with clients
| - Data-loss reports following the latest update
- Geometric drawing limitations in pasture subdivision
- 0.86★ Android-iOS rating gap
| - Map refresh failures during zoomed sessions
- 0.7★ rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
- Limited 9km x 9km spatial resolution coverage
| - Gated B2B subscription model prevents organic user acquisition
- Android-iOS rating gap suggests platform-specific stability issues
| - Inaccurate acre counting and mapping data
- Subscription-gated access to historical data
- Connectivity instability with field hardware
| - 3.5-star rating reflects UX friction
- List-centric interface lacks spatial intuition
- No partner portal for external collaboration
|
| Pricing | subscription | subscription | free | subscription | subscription | subscription | freemium | subscription | freemium | freemium |
| Momentum | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance |
| Update Cadence | 2 versions, ~6d avg | 2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~7d avg | 2 versions, ~1d avg | 1 versions | 2 versions, ~22d avg | 2 versions, ~1d avg | 2 versions, ~10d avg | 2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~2d avg | 2 versions, ~22d avg | 2 versions, ~5d avg |
