Bullhorn Mobile vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Bullhorn Mobile's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Teamtailor
Contender
Hiring
Contender
Staffy
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperBullhornGreenhouse Software IncTeamtailorSmartRecruiters, IncTravel Nurse Across America, LLCShanghai Dewu Information Group Co., Ltd.House of HRZoomInfoStaffy Canada IncZipoApps
CategoryProductivityBusinessBusinessProductivityBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessLifestyleBusiness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating3.3 / 52.1 / 52.4 / 53.3 / 53.2 / 55.0 / 54.0 / 54.6 / 53.8 / 54.2 / 5
Ratings Count595771112149691912
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJul 31, 2018May 20, 2016Sep 20, 2018Feb 5, 2014May 4, 2022Aug 25, 2025Feb 7, 2023Jan 5, 2020May 3, 2017Dec 4, 2023
Last UpdatedMay 5, 2026Jan 13, 2026May 5, 2026May 18, 2026May 11, 2026Apr 30, 2026May 13, 2026May 4, 2026May 4, 2026May 10, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedterribleterrible-mixed--mixednegative-
Score50/10015/10020/100-50/100--65/10025/100-
Praises-
  • Daily usage for interview preparation and candidate feedback remains the core functional anchor for users
  • Core hiring and candidate tracking functionality provides value for recruiters when the application remains stable
-
  • Convenient access to benefits and support team contacts
--
  • Access to direct decision-maker contact information
  • Onboarding support via the dedicated messaging channel resolves setup issues for new applicants
-
Complaints-
  • Lack of core administrative actions forces users to switch to desktop browsers for basic tasks
  • Frequent application crashes and infinite loading loops prevent users from accessing candidate data or jobs
  • Incomplete mobile feature set forces users to rely on browser versions for basic hiring tasks
-
  • Technical friction in profile and credential management
--
  • Android stability and UI regressions
  • Registration process stalls due to missing verification codes and persistent account creation errors
-
Requests-
  • Full parity with desktop features including candidate status updates and social media referral sharing
  • Native document viewing capabilities for candidate files to avoid external browser and file app dependency
-----
  • Transparent communication regarding application status and approval timelines for new health care workers
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Deep integration with staffing-specific workflows like internal submissions
  • Mobile-native record management for candidates and contacts
  • Structured hiring methodology embeds into enterprise workflows to reduce churn
  • AI-assisted candidate summaries differentiate from legacy applicant tracking systems
  • Triple-layer fraud detection increases switching costs for enterprise clients
  • Branded career-site builder creates high switching costs
  • 500+ integrations embed platform into enterprise workflows
  • Real-time approval workflows reduce administrative hiring friction
  • Task assignment integration coordinates distributed hiring teams
  • Centralized credential repository reduces administrative burden
  • Dedicated support team portal provides human-touch differentiation
  • Direct integration with the Dewu e-commerce ecosystem provides immediate access to a massive existing buyer base.
  • Centralized legal-compliance automation reduces B2B churn
  • Unified freelance-temp interface increases user lifetime value
  • Proprietary B2B contact database functions as a primary distribution barrier.
  • Buyer intent signals provide high-value lead intelligence that justifies enterprise-tier pricing.
  • Zero-fee worker model creates a distinct value proposition
  • Same-day direct deposit provides superior financial flexibility
  • Guided step-by-step flow reduces user friction during initial resume setup
Weaknesses
  • 2.3 rating on Android indicates significant UI/UX friction
  • Lack of AI-driven fraud detection compared to Greenhouse
  • 2.1-star rating indicates severe mobile usability friction
  • Lack of candidate status updates forces desktop-only workflow
  • Persistent login failures prevent reliable access to scorecards
  • 2.4★ iOS rating indicates severe stability issues
  • Lack of native PDF viewing forces browser dependency
  • Requires existing enterprise account to access any functionality
  • Lacks AI-powered candidate screening tools found in competitors
  • 2.7★ Android rating indicates significant technical debt
  • Manual document-tracking workflows create user friction
  • Static seller profile management lacks the automated content-generation tools found in competitive productivity apps.
  • Manual discovery flow limits speed-to-hire
  • Lack of AI-driven matching reduces fulfillment reliability
  • 1.64-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates a failure to maintain mobile parity.
  • Reliance on enterprise-grade subscriptions limits the user base to high-budget organizations.
  • High-frequency registration failures (verification codes, account errors)
  • Interface instability (infinite refresh loops) prevents marketplace access
  • Lack of biometric authentication creates a security perception gap for sensitive career data
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreefreefreemiumfreesubscription
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~7d avg2 versions, ~14d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~68d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo2 versions, ~3d avg1 versions3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~7d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~5d avg2 versions, ~56d avg

Compare Bullhorn Mobile head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Bullhorn Mobile, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0