Calorie Counter・ vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Calorie Counter・'s closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

milkberi
Contender
FlashSnack
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperDraunt LLCHealthifyMe Private LimitedJommi UG (haftungsbeschrankt)HAVYN LLCGluroo Imaginations Inc.NETTRACK LLCBiographics Consultoria e Design LTDAJoachim BrunsRiafy Technologies Pvt. Ltd.OLEKSANDR YASHCHUK
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessLifestyleLifestyleHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.6 / 54.6 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 51.0 / 52.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count05,9708103211216
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 11, 2024Dec 17, 2014Aug 18, 2018Mar 11, 2026Apr 26, 2026Mar 12, 2026Jun 9, 2025Apr 14, 2016Oct 27, 2022Jun 2, 2025
Last UpdatedMay 29, 2025Apr 9, 2026Jun 13, 2024May 10, 2026May 6, 2026Apr 8, 2026Jun 9, 2025Apr 14, 2016Jul 16, 2025May 14, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-negative-----terrible--
Score-20/100-----20/100--
Praises-
  • Extensive food database covering diverse Indian and international cuisines supports accurate tracking
--------
Complaints-
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic features like macro tracking and calorie goals frustrates long-term users
--------
Requests-
  • Bidirectional data synchronization with Apple Health and Health Connect for comprehensive tracking
--------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • AI-scan feature reduces logging friction for casual users
  • Lean interface design avoids legacy feature bloat
  • Infinite food database covering global cuisines sustains high initial adoption
  • AI-driven Snap technology reduces logging friction compared to manual-entry competitors
  • Human-coaching tier provides a high-margin revenue anchor
--
  • Frictionless photo-to-macro conversion mechanism
  • Google Health Connect interoperability for cross-tool data utility
  • AI-driven descriptive logging removes manual entry friction
  • Conversational nutrition chat provides immediate feedback loops
-
  • Lightweight interface reduces cognitive load for users seeking simple logging.
--
Weaknesses
  • Zero rating count on iOS indicates lack of market traction
  • Absence of a verified, crowdsourced food database
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features drives high churn
  • Poor support responsiveness regarding subscription cancellations
  • Technical instability post-update
--
  • Zero monetization layer limits development runway
  • Lack of regional food database reduces accuracy
  • Reliance on USDA database limits recognition accuracy
  • No monetization model creates sustainability risk
-
  • 2.0 rating on the only review signals poor user satisfaction.
  • No wearable integration limits utility for active users.
--
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreefreefreefreefreefreefreefree
Momentum-MaintenanceZombieIntense-Maintenance-Zombie-Intense
Update Cadence-2 versions, ~34d avg5 versions5 versions-1 versions-1 versions-5 versions

Compare Calorie Counter・ head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calorie Counter・, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0