Clear: To Dos & Reminders vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Clear: To Dos & Reminders's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

List ◎
Nemesis
Pyrus
Contender
BeeTrack
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperImpendingDiego de Paz SierraLogile, Inc.Simply Good Software, Inc.DolphinsPJSC VimpelComMyBuzz Technologies LimitedTeamup Solutions AGYunaSoft Inc.Jatisari Inovasi Studio
CategoryProductivityProductivityProductivityBusinessSocial NetworkingBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivityProductivity
PlatformiOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.6 / 54.4 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 50.0 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 53.6 / 54.9 / 5
Ratings Count4,6794,8293,4672,0484703,1738,5861,4378,582
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 15, 2012Jun 13, 2018Jun 1, 2017Aug 7, 2010Apr 11, 2017Nov 27, 2025May 10, 2013Jan 4, 2016Nov 5, 2014Dec 20, 2012
Last UpdatedApr 20, 2026May 2, 2024Apr 29, 2026May 19, 2026May 5, 2026Mar 30, 2026Mar 2, 2026Apr 22, 2026Apr 11, 2026May 17, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositivepositivemixed-positive--positivenegativepositive
Score85/10085/10065/100-75/100--85/10025/10085/100
Praises
  • Minimalist design and gesture-based interaction
  • Ease of use and time-saving templates
--
  • Simple and clear interface design allows users to organize volunteer activities without friction
--
  • Granular permission controls for team coordination
  • Visual calendar widget design provides a clear overview of daily schedules for long-term users
  • Regional holiday accuracy
Complaints
  • Lack of cloud-sync and data persistence
  • Lack of collaborative sharing and customization
--
  • Critical authentication failures during account creation prevent new users from accessing the platform
--
  • Lack of full administrative features in the mobile app
  • Aggressive full-screen advertisements interrupt core scheduling workflows and frustrate long-term paying users
  • Critical data loss events erase years of saved calendar entries without user intervention
  • Ad-supported monetization
Requests
  • Native iCloud integration
-------
  • One-time purchase option to remove advertisements instead of recurring subscription models
  • Advanced synchronization
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Gesture-based heatmap interface drives high user emotional attachment
  • Collectible customization creates a distinct aesthetic brand identity
  • Template-driven entry reduces friction for new users
  • iCloud sync creates a low-effort cross-device habit
  • Device-based module visibility protects enterprise data integrity on shared hardware
  • Deep integration with employer-configured scheduling modules ensures B2B stickiness
-
  • Specialized campaign-specific workflows replace fragmented spreadsheets
  • Territorial intelligence tools provide high-value analytical depth for political organizers
  • Beeline corporate infrastructure integration provides secure authentication for existing subscribers
  • NFC module enables hardware-verified field task completion
  • Specialized shift-pattern templates reduce setup time
  • MyShiftManager integration enables B2B distribution
  • Niche-focused UI design provides superior experience
  • 9-level permission system functions as a B2B distribution barrier
  • 20-language support enables international market penetration
  • Web-based administration console reduces mobile-app maintenance overhead
  • High-density widget layouts provide faster glanceable access than full-featured competitors
  • Regional lunar calendar support secures niche user segments
  • Pre-loaded holiday library functions as a regional distribution moat.
  • Visual customization options drive user-level interface preference.
Weaknesses
  • No cloud-sync despite high user demand
  • Premium tier lacks functional utility compared to free-tier alternatives
  • Lack of collaborative sharing limits utility for households
  • Free-only model misses monetization of power users
  • 1.2★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates poor technical parity
  • Lack of consumer-friendly UX requires high onboarding effort
-
  • Critical authentication blockers during account creation
  • Navigation difficulties hinder discovery of core features
  • No native offline mode for field tasks
  • Lacks employee self-service tools for schedule management
  • Premium tier restricts core sync and reporting
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user requests
  • Maintenance-mode update cadence lacks feature expansion
  • Mobile-app lacks full administrative parity
  • Reliance on web-browser for configuration increases churn risk
  • 0.2★ rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Unskippable full-screen ads interrupt core scheduling workflows
  • Critical data loss events after OS updates
  • Widget rendering failures on modern operating systems
  • Ad-supported model creates friction for power users.
  • Lack of cross-platform sync limits professional adoption.
Pricingfreemiumfreefreefreesubscriptionfreefreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfree
MomentumMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceIntenseMaintenanceMaintenance-MaintenanceIntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence1 versions1 versions2 versions, ~1d avg5 versions2 versions, ~8d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~46d avg-2 versions, ~72d avg5 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo

Compare Clear: To Dos & Reminders head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Clear: To Dos & Reminders, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0