MARLVEL

Jobber Field Service Software vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Jobber Field Service Software's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Jobber Field Service Software
This App
Housecall Pro: Field Service
Nemesis
JobNimbus: All-In-One Roof App
Contender
Workiz Field Service Software
Contender
QuickBooks Workforce
Peer
Square Point of Sale (POS)
Peer
Connecteam Team Management App
Peer
Aspire Mobile
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperJobberCodefied Inc.JobNimbusSend A Job IncIntuit Inc.Block, Inc.Connecteam, IncThe Aspire Software Company
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusiness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 52.4 / 5
Ratings Count18,51924,09611,7261,969183,810596,57548,84252
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 21, 2015Sep 1, 2013Sep 28, 2021Aug 15, 2019Jul 17, 2014Apr 3, 2010Jun 8, 2016Oct 3, 2023
Last UpdatedApr 15, 2026Apr 13, 2026May 7, 2026Apr 20, 2026Apr 10, 2026May 1, 2026Mar 22, 2026May 12, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativemixedpositive--negative--
Score35/10055/10085/100--35/100--
Praises
  • Core scheduling and invoicing tools provide significant operational efficiency for small business owners
  • Comprehensive business management features allow service companies to scale operations from paper to digital workflows
  • Workflow centralization
--
  • Simple and functional payment processing interface allows small business owners to manage transactions with ease
--
Complaints
  • Payment processing delays and fund holds create severe cash flow friction for small businesses
  • Frequent forced logouts and application freezes disrupt the workflow for field technicians during active jobs
  • Manual data entry friction
--
  • Abrupt account deactivation and long-term withholding of funds create severe financial instability for small businesses
--
Requests
  • Integration with external payment processors to avoid high fees and long fund hold times
  • Native dark mode support and improved offline data synchronization to assist field technicians in varying environments
  • Advanced dashboarding
--
  • Improved transparency and communication regarding account review triggers and fee structures for business transactions
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • QuickBooks integration creates high switching costs for accounting-dependent businesses
  • AI-driven pricing automation increases average ticket size
  • Consumer financing integration enables higher transaction values
  • AI-driven call handling reduces administrative overhead
  • Industry-standard measurement integrations (EagleView/HOVER) create high switching costs for production-focused contractors.
  • Unified CRM architecture replaces fragmented spreadsheets with a single source of truth for job data.
  • Field-first mobile design provides better usability for on-site crews than office-bound dealership CRM tools.
--
  • Proprietary hardware ecosystem creates high merchant switching costs
  • Integrated banking services increase long-term user retention
-
  • Offline-first architecture ensures business continuity in remote service areas
  • Deep integration with the core Aspire Business Management System locks in enterprise clients
Weaknesses
  • Payment processing holds create severe cash flow friction
  • Persistent update-loop bugs block access for field workers
  • Inflexible recurring billing terms for commercial providers
  • Frequent forced logouts on mobile
  • Inconsistent offline data synchronization
  • MAX tier pricing exceeds solo operator budgets
  • Manual data entry requirements create friction compared to camera-based lead capture in rival platforms.
  • Reporting modules lack the granular sales pipeline health views found in high-volume automotive CRM tools.
  • Closed integration environment limits flexibility compared to platforms with extensive third-party API ecosystems.
--
  • Automated account-deactivation logic triggers merchant financial instability
  • Post-update UI regressions disrupt core transaction workflows
-
  • 2.36–2.62 rating range indicates significant UI/UX friction
  • Lack of automated time tracking increases manual burden on field staff
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumsubscription
MomentumIntenseIntenseIntenseIntenseIntenseActiveIntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg5 versions5 versions4 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~21d avg5 versions2 versions, ~2d avg

Compare Jobber Field Service Software head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Jobber Field Service Software, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0