MARLVEL

lululemon vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against lululemon's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

lululemon
This App
Shpock: Buy & Sell Marketplace
Nemesis
Carhartt WIP
Contender
SPC: Student Discounts
Contender
Quince
Contender
FINN FLARE – магазин одежды
Contender
myKiK - Magyarország
Peer
Mall of the Emirates (MOE)
Peer
ION Orchard
Peer
Tiendeo - Offers & Catalogues
Peer
Core Identity
Developerlululemon athletica canada inc.finderly GmbH & Co KGWork in Progress Textilhandels GmbHStudent Price Card Ltd.Lastbrand IncFINN FLAREKiK Textilien und Non-Food GmbHMajid Al Futtaim Properties LLCION OrchardTiendeo Web Marketing S.L.
CategoryShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShoppingShopping
PlatformiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.9 / 54.2 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.9 / 54.9 / 54.0 / 53.1 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count508,6426201,3733,3715,9006,73777143,7531,884
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 2, 2014Oct 24, 2012Jul 31, 2024Jul 30, 2014Mar 2, 2025Mar 22, 2018Oct 13, 2024Jan 25, 2019May 20, 2010Dec 21, 2011
Last UpdatedMay 11, 2026Apr 9, 2026Apr 24, 2026May 14, 2026May 15, 2026May 6, 2026Feb 26, 2026May 20, 2026May 11, 2026May 11, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativeterrible--positive--mixed-excellent
Score35/10015/100--75/100--45/100-85/100
Praises
  • High quality apparel materials and comfortable fit drive strong brand loyalty among repeat customers
  • Collection and delivery options provide utility for local item exchange
--
  • High product quality and material standards drive strong customer satisfaction across clothing and home categories
----
  • Centralized access to local retail catalogues provides significant convenience for price comparison shoppers
  • Digital catalogue access reduces reliance on physical paper mailers and minimizes household waste
  • Fast and responsive interface performance improves the efficiency of finding current store deals
Complaints
  • Login and account creation failures prevent users from accessing the app entirely
  • Mandatory subscription fees for listing items drive users to competing platforms
  • Inability to cancel recurring subscription charges through the application interface
--
  • Deep-linking issues force users into the app store instead of opening specific product pages
----
  • Inaccurate or outdated store location data causes confusion for users visiting physical branches
  • Navigation complexity following recent interface changes makes finding specific product categories difficult
Requests
  • Automated application of store credit to online purchases to avoid manual checkout friction
---
  • Implementation of a meaningful rewards program to incentivize referrals and user-generated content
----
  • Integration of loyalty card storage would consolidate shopping tools into a single application
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Technical fabric design drives repeat purchase behavior
  • Studio content library creates high-margin subscription revenue
  • Local-first collection model reduces shipping logistics friction
  • Social sharing tools drive external traffic into the install funnel
--
  • Factory-direct model captures margins to sustain lower price points
  • 365-day return policy functions as a primary conversion barrier
--
  • Direct integration with physical mall infrastructure drives high-intent local traffic
  • SHARE rewards program creates a B2B loyalty moat across 5,000+ partner stores
-
  • Centralized catalogue aggregation replaces physical mailers, driving high daily utility
  • Fast interface performance sustains user engagement post-update
Weaknesses
  • Persistent login failures block user access
  • Inaccurate inventory data triggers order cancellations
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Mandatory subscription fees drive high churn
  • Broken cancellation flows in the interface
  • Technical instability post-update
--
  • Deep-linking regressions force users into app store loops
  • Technical instability during account management prevents purchase completion
--
  • 1.86-star Android rating indicates significant technical instability
  • Static directory lacks personalized discovery tools found in modern retail apps
-
  • Stale store location data causes real-world friction for users
  • Navigation complexity post-update frustrates long-term users
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreesubscriptionfreefreefreefreefreefree
MomentumActiveActive--ActiveIntense-Active-Maintenance
Update Cadence5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~17d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg--5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions-5 versions, ~5d avg-1 versions

Compare lululemon head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by lululemon, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0