Carrom Pool: Disc Game vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Carrom Pool: Disc Game's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Checkers!!
Contender
Clank!
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperMohd AjmalScopely, Inc.Bluetile Games S.L.Blackout Lab SLMiroslav Kisly LTMeeple CorpUAB Target WorksBeach Bum LtdDire Wolf DigitalTwin Sails Interactive
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesPuzzleGamesGamesGamesGamesGames
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.5 / 54.6 / 54.9 / 54.4 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count61,6543,737,24757,39452912,58016413820,6111,2247,352
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$3.99FreeFree$6.99$8.99
Release DateMar 26, 2019Apr 11, 2023Feb 24, 2022Apr 13, 2022Jan 17, 2013Jun 26, 2025Feb 25, 2012Sep 4, 2022Oct 21, 2024Dec 3, 2019
Last UpdatedMay 6, 2026Jun 25, 2026Jun 2, 2026May 23, 2025Apr 3, 2026Apr 17, 2026Jan 8, 2024Feb 25, 2025Mar 20, 2026Apr 7, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativemixedmixed--positive-terriblepositivenegative
Score35/10065/10055/100--75/100-20/10075/10025/100
Praises
  • Core gameplay mechanics provide a relaxing and enjoyable experience for casual time-pass sessions
  • High-production value and frequent event updates
  • Classic dice gameplay mechanics provide a relaxing and addictive way to pass time
--
  • Faithful digital adaptation of the physical board game mechanics provides an authentic tabletop experience
-
  • Core domino gameplay loop provides an enjoyable and entertaining experience for casual players
  • Digital adaptation of the board game provides a faithful and highly portable experience
  • Core board game mechanics provide deep strategic satisfaction for long-term hobbyist players
Complaints
  • Prevalence of automated bot players and cheating software ruins the competitive integrity of matches
  • Excessive frequency of non-skippable advertisements disrupts the flow of the core gameplay loop
  • Aggressive monetization pressure and progression gates
  • Excessive ad frequency interrupts gameplay and degrades the overall user experience
--
  • Three-dimensional board view and camera controls obscure gameplay and complicate precise tile placement during matches
-
  • Aggressive ad frequency and forced monetization pressure disrupt the core gameplay experience
  • Perceived unfair matchmaking and rigged boneyard mechanics favor computer opponents over human players
  • Animations and AI turns consume excessive time even when using the fast mode
  • Frequent application crashes and game state corruption occur during online multiplayer sessions
Requests
  • Implementation of an instant report button to combat widespread cheating and automated play
  • Cloud-save synchronization
  • Reduced ad frequency during active matches to allow for uninterrupted gameplay sessions
--
  • Accessibility features including colorblind modes are required to distinguish between similar colored tile types
-
  • Social features like in-game chat to facilitate communication and friendship between opponents
  • Accessibility options for font scaling would improve readability on smaller mobile devices
  • Implementation of an undo button to correct accidental inputs during complex card actions
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Physics-based gameplay provides a more tactile, skill-reliant experience than luck-based board mechanics.
  • Offline play maintains engagement in low-connectivity segments.
  • High-production IP integrations drive superior acquisition
  • Social-griefing mechanics create sticky network effects
  • Offline-ready core loop sustains user acquisition in low-connectivity segments
  • Progression-based cosmetic dice faces drive long-term retention
  • Multi-mode multiplayer expands session-type versatility
-
  • 11-level AI difficulty provides a consistent training ground for solo players
  • ELO-based online matchmaking maintains competitive integrity for the core audience
  • Faithful adaptation of Spiel des Jahres mechanics sustains high user satisfaction
  • Cross-platform account linking increases multi-device stickiness
  • Distraction-free classic gameplay design sustains a low barrier to entry for casual users.
  • Adaptive AI engine maintains engagement for solo players without requiring manual difficulty adjustments.
  • Modern visual interface differentiates from utilitarian classic-edition rivals
  • Multi-variant rulesets accommodate diverse skill levels from beginner to master
  • Faithful digital port of physical board game mechanics
  • Cross-platform multiplayer infrastructure for social play
  • High-fidelity visual immersion compared to static card rivals
  • Faithful board game adaptation sustains organic install velocity
  • Modular DLC strategy increases lifetime value per user
Weaknesses
  • High frequency of unskippable ads disrupts core gameplay flow.
  • Absence of an instant report button for cheating software.
  • Negative sentiment anchored to bot-driven matches.
  • Heavy reliance on IAP-driven progression gates
  • High-frequency complaints regarding monetization pressure
  • Ad-density during active matches drives high churn
  • Technical instability during ad-transitions degrades session quality
  • Lack of cloud-save persistence causes progress loss on reinstallation
-
  • Lack of meta-progression systems like seasonal passes
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user requests
  • Static interface compared to modern board-game rivals
  • 3D camera controls obscure legal placement spots
  • Monetization relies on aesthetic items rather than high-value content expansions
  • No cloud-save functionality creates churn risk for users switching devices.
  • Lack of persistent competitive leagues limits long-term retention compared to modern board game adaptations.
  • Aggressive ad-to-play ratio drives high churn among casual users
  • Perceived algorithmic bias in boneyard mechanics erodes player trust
  • Coin economy imbalances lead to rapid, frustrating loss of progress
  • Sluggish animation pacing causing high-frequency complaints
  • Cramped interface elements on mobile devices
  • Persistent post-match technical instability and crashes
  • Premium $8.99 entry barrier limits casual funnel
  • 0-rating Android base indicates critical platform-specific instability
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreepaidfreefreemiumpaidpaid
MomentumActive-MaintenanceSteady-Active-ZombieMaintenanceActive
Update Cadence5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~9d avg-5 versions, ~16d avg4 versions-5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~11d avg-5 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~15d avg

Compare Carrom Pool: Disc Game head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Carrom Pool: Disc Game, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0