Calorie Counter & Food Tracker vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Calorie Counter & Food Tracker's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperMunicorn LimitedHealthifyMe Private LimitedMehmet BayramZipoAppsDEEP FLOW SOFTWARE SERVICESWachangaFLO HEALTH UK LIMITEDBioWink GmbHWinkpass Creations, Inc.Riafy Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.6 / 50.0 / 54.4 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.4 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count21,2765,97001169262,9791,870,367394,6954,8642
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 31, 2024Dec 17, 2014Aug 17, 2022Nov 18, 2024Jul 25, 2024Dec 31, 2024Oct 3, 2015Jul 9, 2013Dec 9, 2009Oct 27, 2022
Last UpdatedMay 18, 2026Apr 9, 2026Jan 22, 2024May 12, 2026Mar 13, 2025Apr 16, 2026May 12, 2026May 13, 2026Mar 16, 2026Jul 16, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterriblenegative--mixedmixednegativenegativemixed-
Score25/10020/100--45/10045/10025/10035/10035/100-
Praises
  • Accurate food database entries allow for quick and effortless daily calorie logging
  • Extensive food database covering diverse Indian and international cuisines supports accurate tracking
--
  • Food scanning functionality provides significant utility for tracking daily nutritional intake and progress
  • Automatic calorie calculation from food photography provides significant time savings for daily tracking
  • Accurate cycle tracking and ovulation predictions provide reliable health insights for long-term users
  • Accurate cycle prediction and symptom tracking provide significant health insights for long-term users
  • Long-term cycle tracking utility provides consistent value for users over many years of use
-
Complaints
  • Deceptive subscription practices and hidden charges create significant financial frustration for new users
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic features like macro tracking and calorie goals frustrates long-term users
--
  • Inaccurate AI food recognition and lack of manual editing tools frustrate users seeking precision
  • Inaccurate food recognition and calorie estimation force users to manually correct data frequently
  • Aggressive subscription prompts and paywalls block access to basic health tracking and educational features
  • Aggressive subscription upsell popups interrupt the core tracking workflow multiple times per session
  • Aggressive advertising content prevents users from accessing core tracking features after recent updates
-
Requests
  • Comprehensive health data syncing including nutrition and fiber metrics for better tracking
  • Bidirectional data synchronization with Apple Health and Health Connect for comprehensive tracking
--
  • Manual override functionality for food logs and nutrition data to ensure logging accuracy
  • Integration with health platforms to sync nutrition data across other fitness applications
  • Partner integration features would allow users to share symptom data and cycle status
  • Expanded exercise and health metric logging options to better capture diverse physical activities
  • Option to disable specific automated spotting markers for users experiencing irregular perimenopausal cycles
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • AI-first food recognition lowers the barrier to entry for casual users
  • Cunningham-based BMR calculations provide scientific credibility for personalized meal plans
  • Infinite food database covering global cuisines sustains high initial adoption
  • AI-driven Snap technology reduces logging friction compared to manual-entry competitors
  • Human-coaching tier provides a high-margin revenue anchor
  • Native iOS architecture ensures faster load times and lower battery consumption than cross-platform competitors.
  • Minimalist interface reduces cognitive load for users overwhelmed by feature-heavy dashboards.
  • Automated photo-based macro analysis reduces user friction
  • Lean interface avoids legacy feature bloat
  • Fasting-first habit loop drives daily active usage
  • Barcode scanner reduces friction for new users
  • AI-based photo logging reduces manual friction for casual users
  • Gamified streaks and badges drive session frequency
  • 460 million user base drives AI-model accuracy [Metric: Total Users]
  • ISO 27001/ISMS certification establishes high-level security [Mechanism: Privacy-first design]
  • All-in-one lifecycle content covers puberty to perimenopause [Mechanism: Unified interface]
  • Clinical brand identity sustains user trust
  • Multi-mode tracking extends user lifecycle
  • Wearable integration automates biometric data input
  • 17-year brand history builds trust with a mature, loyal user base
  • Discreet app icon design supports privacy-conscious user segments
-
Weaknesses
  • Lack of in-app cancellation forces reliance on unresponsive email support
  • Premium tier pricing lacks transparency before payment
  • Incomplete health data syncing limits utility for power users
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features drives high churn
  • Poor support responsiveness regarding subscription cancellations
  • Technical instability post-update
  • Zero automated logging features force high-friction manual entry.
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user demand for cross-device data persistence.
  • 116 total ratings indicate low market penetration
  • Lacks proprietary food database for regional accuracy
  • No conversational coaching features
  • Lack of manual data correction creates precision churn
  • Aggressive subscription prompts drive negative sentiment
  • Premium tier at $29.99/year above category median
  • Technical instability causes data loss during scanning
  • AI misidentification forces frequent manual entry
  • Historical data loss following the latest update [Metric: 1★ review frequency]
  • Aggressive subscription prompts blocking basic features [Metric: Sentiment Score 25]
  • Lack of responsive customer support for billing [Metric: Billing complaint volume]
  • Aggressive subscription popups drive churn
  • Lack of flexibility for irregular cycles
  • Intrusive notifications disrupt user privacy
  • Aggressive ad-blocking prevents core feature access
  • Data synchronization failures cause historical data loss during device migration
-
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfree
MomentumActiveMaintenance-ZombieMaintenanceIntenseActiveIntenseMaintenance-
Update Cadence5 versions, ~19d avg2 versions, ~34d avg-1 versions, 1 majors/6mo2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~232d avg5 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~15d avg5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~108d avg-

Compare Calorie Counter & Food Tracker head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calorie Counter & Food Tracker, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0