EYExcel vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against EYExcel's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

EYExcel
This App
Brainshark
Contender
Highspot
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperMeiotic Inc.ShowpadBrainshark, Inc.Highspot, Inc.Box, Inc.Dropbox, Inc.salesforce.com
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityBusiness
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.0 / 54.2 / 54.2 / 54.8 / 50.0 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count628891140815,551342,622
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJun 15, 2015May 4, 2011Jan 14, 2011Nov 17, 2016Sep 22, 2016Sep 29, 2009Nov 22, 2010
Last UpdatedApr 17, 2026May 14, 2026Oct 23, 2025May 6, 2026Nov 1, 2021Apr 20, 2026Apr 21, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-mixedmixed--mixedpositive
Score-65/10060/100--48/10075/100
Praises-
  • Sales enablement features provide a central repository for marketing collateral and sales presentations
  • Offline viewing capabilities allow users to consume training content during travel without network connectivity
--
  • Reliability & Accessibility
  • Cross-Platform Syncing
  • Highly customizable CRM workflows allow businesses to tailor the interface to specific operational requirements
Complaints-
  • Shell runtime errors occurring at application startup prevent access to essential sales content
  • Frequent login failures and authentication errors prevent users from accessing their training materials
--
  • Pricing & Storage Tiers
  • Aggressive Upselling
  • Inconsistent user interface design compared to browser versions creates navigation friction for mobile users
Requests-
  • Integration with additional cloud storage providers like Google Drive and OneDrive for file imports
  • Playback speed controls would allow users to adjust training pace for better comprehension
---
  • Automatic data synchronization capabilities are needed to support work in low network connectivity environments
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Custom sandbox applets create high switching costs via purpose-built sales workflows
  • Bi-directional Salesforce integration provides closed-loop ROI analytics
  • Offline-first architecture ensures continuity in remote field environments
  • GenieAI engine justifies enterprise-level contract pricing
  • Offline-first architecture secures field-based retention
  • Native Salesforce integration embeds training into existing sales workflows, increasing adoption and contract stickiness.
  • Offline access ensures continuous learning for field sales reps on the road, maintaining engagement outside of office connectivity.
  • Offline content access ensures field-sales productivity in low-connectivity environments
  • AI-driven deal risk surfacing provides actionable intelligence for enterprise sales reps
  • Enterprise-grade compliance tools secure high-value contracts
  • AI-driven workflow automation increases platform stickiness
  • Integration into Box content suite reduces churn
  • Superior third-party integrations (Slack, Adobe, Zoom)
  • High sync reliability and instant replication
  • Advanced file recovery with Dropbox Rewind
  • Agentforce conversational automation creates high enterprise-grade switching costs
  • Low-code Mobile Builder reduces implementation friction for enterprise clients
  • Offline-first homepages secure consistent field-service retention
Weaknesses
  • Limited review volume (6 total ratings) suggests low brand visibility
  • Lack of integrated sales coaching features compared to broader suites
  • Enterprise-only pricing model restricts mid-market adoption
  • Persistent Android runtime errors block content access
  • Opaque subscription pricing creates early-funnel friction
  • Inconsistent cross-device synchronization forces manual work
  • Frequent login failures and authentication errors prevent users from accessing their training materials.
  • Application instability and freezing on startup impact usability on modern mobile hardware.
  • Absence of physical-to-digital workspace integration creates a utility gap against office-management rivals
  • Lack of internal collaboration tools limits cross-departmental stickiness
  • iOS client has no updates since 2021
  • Interface lacks modern consumer-facing polish
  • High dependency on enterprise procurement cycles
  • Restrictive 2GB free storage tier
  • Aggressive in-app promotion UI (4+ pop-ups)
  • Technical bugs in 2FA/Login systems
  • 0.99★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • Persistent white-screen crashes during active use
  • Mobile-desktop UI parity friction limits power-user efficiency
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscription
Momentum-MaintenanceZombieMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceIntense
Update Cadence-3 versions, ~25d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg3 versions, ~1128d avg3 versions, ~21d avg5 versions, ~7d avg

Compare EYExcel head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by EYExcel, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0