Full Slate vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Full Slate's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Full Slate
This App
CosmoLex
Contender
ServiceCore
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperInternet Brands, Inc.ADP, IncShiftboard, Inc.Townsquare Interactive,LLCService AutopilotECi Software SolutionsCosmolex LLCGuusto Gifts Inc.ServiceCore LLCRepMove
CategoryProductivityBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusiness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating1.6 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 53.9 / 52.4 / 54.0 / 52.8 / 54.0 / 53.0 / 54.9 / 5
Ratings Count237,08915,40532897512454360
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJun 20, 2021Dec 9, 2019Dec 20, 2009Jan 19, 2020Mar 10, 2014Mar 12, 2020Jun 21, 2017Feb 19, 2014Oct 17, 2017Jun 23, 2021
Last UpdatedJul 16, 2025Mar 12, 2026Mar 26, 2026Aug 29, 2024Apr 17, 2026Mar 26, 2026Oct 6, 2022May 5, 2026May 4, 2026May 10, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterribleterrible-negative------
Score15/10015/100-25/100------
Praises
  • Long-term users appreciate the core scheduling utility provided by the platform over many years
  • Facial recognition login provides a convenient alternative to manual password entry for daily users
-
  • Business management tools provide a centralized hub for organizing daily professional workflows and client communications
------
Complaints
  • Frequent application crashes prevent users from accessing their schedules or managing client appointments
  • Persistent white screen of death prevents users from accessing essential time tracking and payroll functions
-
  • Aggressive billing practices and difficulty canceling subscriptions lead to accusations of deceptive business conduct
  • Unreliable notification systems cause missed client messages and potential loss of business opportunities
------
Requests
  • Restoration of previous application versions to regain functional scheduling capabilities for business
  • Improved user interface design to simplify daily time tracking and administrative punch edits
-
  • Direct contact email access for support to resolve account and billing disputes
------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • QuickBooks integration embeds the platform into critical accounting workflows
  • Prepaid package management creates a direct revenue-expansion lever
  • Biometric login reduces friction for daily users
  • Payroll integration creates high switching costs for enterprise clients
  • Enterprise-grade reliability sustains high user satisfaction
  • Real-time notification infrastructure ensures schedule-change compliance
  • High-touch support model creates client retention
  • All-in-one suite increases operational switching costs
--
  • Integrated IOLTA accounting functions as a B2B distribution barrier
  • Markup-free reward redemption model builds employee trust
  • SMS/QR delivery mechanism captures non-desk workforce segments
  • Social impact integration aligns with enterprise ESG mandates
  • Industry-specific dispatching logic for liquid waste operations
  • QuickBooks integration reduces accounting friction for small business owners
  • AI-driven note-to-CRM automation creates a workflow lock-in for field reps
  • Specialized territory management provides a vertical-specific barrier against general calendar apps
Weaknesses
  • 1.6★ rating reflects persistent crash loops
  • No offline mode forces reliance on desktop access
  • Mobile interface requires redundant data entry
  • Persistent white-screen lockouts during authentication
  • Complex navigation for simple administrative tasks
  • 0.7★ rating gap between Android and iOS
  • Premium subscription gate limits organic discovery
  • Lack of integrated invoicing forces users to secondary apps
  • High billing friction and cancellation difficulty
  • Unreliable push notifications causing missed revenue
  • Technical instability in contact import functions
--
  • 2.75-star Android rating indicates significant mobile-UX friction
  • Lacks automated compliance rules engine for enterprise
  • No integrated shift-swapping or scheduling tools
  • Limited HRIS and payroll system connectivity
  • 3.0-star rating baseline indicates UX friction
  • Manual scheduling processes increase administrative burden
  • Lack of automated labor compliance tools
  • 7-day trial is short for complex CRM adoption
  • Manual route entry creates high friction compared to natural language rivals
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreesubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionsubscription
MomentumMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceZombie--ZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~281d avg5 versions2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~487d avg--2 versions, ~1285d avg1 versions2 versions, ~3d avg2 versions, ~2d avg

Compare Full Slate head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Full Slate, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0