数学クイズ なん度? vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against 数学クイズ なん度?'s closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperStudySwitch, Inc.ABYLITH GAMES LLPNicholas WilsonLittle 10 RobotGameZen, Inc.Makkajai Edu Tech Private LimitedDesmosV PUGAZHENTHIWebtowebTran Duy
CategoryEducationGamesEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducation
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.6 / 51.0 / 54.5 / 54.0 / 54.5 / 54.3 / 54.5 / 54.5 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count1956,154182221,3141,244771,2264,853
PriceFreeFree$0.99$2.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJul 14, 2012Sep 8, 2021Apr 30, 2012Aug 22, 2023Mar 29, 2011Dec 10, 2015Jun 18, 2013Aug 15, 2021Oct 30, 2018Apr 28, 2020
Last UpdatedFeb 6, 2026May 12, 2026May 9, 2026Sep 3, 2025Oct 18, 2016Aug 14, 2024Mar 12, 2026Apr 4, 2026Jan 9, 2026Feb 7, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixed----mixedexcellent-positive-
Score70/100----65/10085/100-85/100-
Praises
  • Specialized geometry curriculum
----
  • Customizable difficulty settings for each player enable fair competition between children and adults
  • Versatile graphing and calculation tools provide academic utility for students and engineering professionals
  • Intuitive interface design makes complex mathematical visualization accessible for casual and advanced users
  • Creative features like audio tone generation and custom color palettes encourage non-academic exploration
-
  • Simplicity and speed of the interface for quick homework checks
-
Complaints
  • Dated interface design
----
  • Aggressive paywall implementation creates frustration for users expecting a free educational experience
  • Lack of a native dark mode causes eye strain during extended night-time study sessions
  • UI regressions in the latest update make function selection and list management cumbersome
  • Inconsistent behavior with external hardware like Bluetooth keyboards limits productivity on tablet devices
-
  • Lack of advanced features like graphing or step-by-step logic
-
Requests
  • Competitive social leaderboards
----
  • Real-time multiplayer matchmaking availability to allow competition against human opponents
  • Integration of geometry and 3D graphing modes to match the functionality of the web version
  • Persistent settings for interface preferences like contrast and text size to avoid manual reconfiguration
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Handwritten memo feature reduces calculation friction
  • Specialized geometry curriculum provides clear educational utility
-
  • Distraction-free interface provides a focused testing environment for users avoiding game-heavy alternatives.
-
  • Perfect Run scoring mechanism drives high-intensity engagement sessions.
  • Freemium model effectively segments casual users from dedicated math learners.
  • Difficulty-handicapping system enables intergenerational play
  • Local multiplayer modes drive organic classroom acquisition
  • Common Core alignment secures B2B legitimacy
  • Proprietary math engine enables complex calculus visualization
  • Accessibility suite functions as a B2B distribution moat into institutional partnerships
  • Ad-free interface drives high academic trust
-
  • Distraction-free interface minimizes cognitive load for single-result tasks
  • Low-friction input workflow supports rapid utility usage
-
Weaknesses
  • Dated interface design (2012 release date)
  • Lack of competitive social leaderboards
  • No cloud-save functionality
-
  • Paid-upfront pricing at $0.99 creates a conversion barrier against free competitors.
  • Lacks social features and progress tracking to encourage repeat usage.
-
  • Infrequent update cadence suggests maintenance-mode status.
  • Lack of cloud-save functionality creates churn risk for multi-device users.
  • High subscription cost relative to perceived value
  • Aggressive paywall triggers negative user sentiment
  • Computer-controlled difficulty lacks defensive options for novices
  • No native dark mode despite high-frequency user requests
  • UI regressions in the latest update make function selection cumbersome
  • Inconsistent Bluetooth keyboard support limits tablet productivity
-
  • Ad-supported model lacks premium retention features
  • No symbolic math engine limits utility for higher-level courses
-
Pricingfreemiumfreepaidpaidfreemiumsubscriptionfreefreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceIntenseMaintenance-ZombieZombie--Zombie-
Update Cadence5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~266d avg5 versions4 versions, ~1167d avg-2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~3278d avg5 versions--1 versions-

Compare 数学クイズ なん度? head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by 数学クイズ なん度?, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0