Protein Tracker. vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Protein Tracker.'s closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperKai OelfkeHealthVida GmbH & Co. KG.Bart JacobsZipoAppsPomegranate Apps LLCToast Studio AustraliaFirst PhormGrow Labs LLCSnatch Education (OPC)Private LimitedALWAYS FIT SUPLEMENTOS ALIMENTICIOS LTDA
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessFood & DrinkHealth & FitnessFood & DrinkHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.3 / 53.9 / 54.3 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count1,368246,117605238275162,2036,7311,8705
PriceFreeFreeFreeFree$4.99$0.99FreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 9, 2023May 3, 2019Jul 27, 2023Jun 10, 2020Oct 27, 2010Sep 30, 2016Mar 25, 2019Jun 25, 2025Aug 25, 2023Jun 3, 2025
Last UpdatedSep 14, 2025May 8, 2026Sep 18, 2025Jan 16, 2025Jun 26, 2023Sep 16, 2024May 12, 2026Jul 1, 2026Oct 14, 2025May 14, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositivemixed-positivenegative-positive---
Score85/10045/100-85/10035/100-75/100---
Praises
  • Simplicity and focus
  • Intermittent fasting timer and progress tracking provide clear structure for weight loss goals
--
  • Detailed nutrient tracking provides deep insight into specific vitamin and mineral intake levels
-
  • Personalized advisor coaching provides essential accountability and motivation for long-term fitness transformation goals
---
Complaints
  • Subscription gating
  • Aggressive paywall loops prevent users from accessing basic fasting features without subscription
--
  • Barcode scanner and manual food entry features fail to function correctly following recent updates
-
  • Technical instability and UI regressions following recent updates disrupt daily food logging and workout tracking
---
Requests
  • Cloud sync
  • Apple Watch integration is required to track fasting progress without manual phone interaction
--
  • Customizable search filters to omit specific food categories or regional items from results
-
  • Improved food logging functionality including favoriting items and saving custom recipes for faster entry
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Distraction-free interface sustains high user satisfaction.
  • Widget integration enables one-tap logging.
  • Protein-specific focus differentiates from bloated competitors.
  • Gamified progress tracking via Fastic Score sustains daily habit formation
  • AI-powered meal recognition reduces logging friction for high-intent users
-
  • Relaxation content library reduces fasting stress
  • Intuitive timer interface lowers onboarding friction
  • Offline-first database architecture ensures utility in environments without connectivity
  • Granular micronutrient tracking provides a specialized resource for clinical-grade dietary research
-
  • Human-led coaching model creates high switching costs through personalized accountability
  • Transformation challenges drive long-term retention via gamified quarterly competition
  • All-in-one platform integration reduces user reliance on fragmented fitness tools
  • Science-backed growth engine provides clear utility
  • Freemium model gates advanced analytical tools
  • Global reach in emerging markets
--
Weaknesses
  • Subscription-gated AI analysis limits free-tier utility.
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user requests.
  • 0.7-star rating gap between iOS and Android.
  • Aggressive paywall loops at onboarding drive high churn
  • Persistent calendar spam damages brand reputation
  • Poor support responsiveness for billing disputes
-
  • Subscription price exceeds category median
  • Lacks advanced biological state tracking
  • Barcode scanner and manual entry bugs in the latest version drive high-frequency churn
  • Search relevance is degraded by obscure, non-local food items
-
  • Technical instability following recent updates disrupts core daily logging habits
  • UI regressions increase tap-depth for basic tracking tasks
  • Inconsistent notification behavior prevents timely engagement with advisor messages
  • High manual input burden for tracking
  • Lack of wearable device integration
  • Premium tier lacks physical product links
--
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreesubscriptionfreemiumfreesubscriptionfreemiumfreefree
MomentumMaintenanceActive-ZombieZombieMaintenanceSteadyActive-Intense
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions, ~7d avg-1 versions5 versions5 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~14d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~6d avg-5 versions

Compare Protein Tracker. head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Protein Tracker., its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0