Q by TEAM Software vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Q by TEAM Software's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

List ◎
Nemesis
Teamwork.com
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperTEAM SoftwareDiego de Paz SierraDanijel CvetkovicTeamwork Crew LimitedMd Milon HossainThe Reynolds and Reynolds Company and its affiliatesKarthik rajaDominique Andr GuniaZipoAppsnguyen thanh
CategoryBusinessProductivityProductivityBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivityProductivityProductivityProductivity
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating3.4 / 54.6 / 51.8 / 52.2 / 53.4 / 52.2 / 55.0 / 53.5 / 54.1 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count54,8295594189322148
PriceFreeFreeFreeFree$9.99FreeFree$0.99FreeFree
Release DateNov 8, 2018Jun 13, 2018Apr 22, 2018Mar 25, 2021Mar 17, 2026Jan 14, 2017Nov 15, 2025Jan 17, 2014Dec 1, 2015Dec 4, 2024
Last UpdatedJul 26, 2019May 2, 2024Jun 8, 2020May 12, 2026May 13, 2026Apr 19, 2026Nov 20, 2025Feb 15, 2021Nov 6, 2025Apr 19, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-positive---mixed----
Score-85/100---40/100----
Praises-
  • Ease of use and time-saving templates
--------
Complaints-
  • Lack of collaborative sharing and customization
---
  • Dated and cumbersome interface
----
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Right-sized toolset for small business operational simplicity
  • Direct connection between management and field staff
  • Template-driven entry reduces friction for new users
  • iCloud sync creates a low-effort cross-device habit
-
  • Profitability forecasting provides high-switching-cost data lock-in for agencies
  • AI-driven scheduling functions as a B2B distribution moat into professional services
-
  • Forced-march sales steps enforce dealership-specific workflows
  • Deep integration with Reynolds and Reynolds enterprise CRM
--
  • Integrated chat-to-calendar workflow reduces context switching for family coordination
  • Color-coded group views provide immediate visual clarity for multi-user schedules
-
Weaknesses
  • 3.4-star rating on limited feedback
  • No major feature updates since 2019
  • Lacks offline task execution capabilities
  • Lack of collaborative sharing limits utility for households
  • Free-only model misses monetization of power users
-
  • 2.1★ iOS rating indicates severe mobile UX friction
  • Complex project hierarchies create high cognitive load on small screens
-
  • Dated interface design (top complaint theme) erodes usage
  • 2.2-star rating reflects significant user friction
--
  • Manual event entry creates high friction compared to natural language competitors
  • Lack of AI scheduling assistant limits utility for power users
-
Pricingsubscriptionfreefreesubscriptionpaidfreefreepaidfreemiumfree
MomentumZombieZombie-MaintenanceIntenseMaintenance-MaintenanceZombie-
Update Cadence1 versions1 versions-3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~14d avg5 versions2 versions, ~2d avg-5 versions1 versions-

Compare Q by TEAM Software head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Q by TEAM Software, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0