ShelbyNEXT | Giving vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against ShelbyNEXT | Giving's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Tithe.ly
Nemesis
Splitly
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperMinistry BrandsYour Giving, Inc.HakbahStep Up Labs, Inc.GivelifyKnox CountyAbdullah Sulaiman
CategoryFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceUtilitiesFinance
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating2.7 / 54.5 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count111,1211,8041,60193,21600
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 11, 2015Sep 19, 2013Jun 6, 2020Dec 18, 2013Oct 24, 2013Mar 8, 2023May 8, 2025
Last UpdatedOct 30, 2018May 11, 2026May 12, 2026May 7, 2026May 8, 2026Sep 27, 2024May 8, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedpositivemixed-excellent--
Score35/10085/10065/100-95/100--
Praises
  • Direct donation functionality allows users to support specific church funds conveniently
  • Increased giving consistency
  • Digital Jameya convenience
----
Complaints
  • Authentication failures and password reset loops prevent users from accessing accounts
  • API errors during payment method entry block the primary donation workflow
  • Setup friction
  • Android performance friction
----
Requests
  • Comprehensive donation history reporting is needed to track annual giving totals
------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Deep integration with ShelbyNEXT church management modules creates institutional switching costs
  • Zero-cost entry point captures market share
  • All-Access bundle increases switching costs
  • Cultural resonance of Jameya model drives trust
  • AI-powered engine provides proactive savings guidance
  • Smart settlement algorithm minimizes transaction fees for users
  • Web-link sharing removes the app-install barrier for group participants
  • GPS-based location pinpointing reduces donor friction during services
  • 45,000+ verified reviews build trust for new users
  • Official Knox County system integration creates a high trust barrier for private-sector competitors.
  • Income-splitting mindsets provide a differentiated psychological framework for personal finance
  • AI receipt scanning reduces manual entry friction for users
Weaknesses
  • Authentication failures and password reset loops prevent account access
  • API errors during payment method entry block primary donation workflows
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • Dependency on transaction fees limits margins
  • 0.75★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates parity issues
  • 199 SAR fee structure limits low-income adoption
  • Premium tier lacks high-frequency utility of credit-linked competitors
  • No automated bank-syncing features to reconcile shared expenses
  • Lack of integrated church management tools compared to Tithe.ly
  • Dependency on specific organizational adoption for user growth
  • Static interface lacks high-frequency engagement features, leading to low user retention between payment cycles.
  • Manual data entry requirement creates high user friction
  • Lack of bank synchronization limits real-time financial visibility
  • No current monetization model
Pricingfreefreemiumpaidfreemiumfreefreefree
MomentumZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceZombieMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~152d avg2 versions, ~3d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~6d avg1 versions2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~103d avg2 versions, ~94d avg

Compare ShelbyNEXT | Giving head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ShelbyNEXT | Giving, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0