Report updated May 25, 2026
Staff Times - My Time
For business owners, accountants, HR professionals, and project managers overseeing mixed teams of full-time, part-time, and freelance staff.
Staff Times - My Time is an established business app that is free with in-app purchases.
What is Staff Times - My Time?
Staff Times is a professional time, attendance, and project-tracking app for businesses, accountants, and HR professionals on iOS.
Users hire the app to automate complex overtime and labor-law compliance, reducing the administrative burden of manual payroll reporting.
Current Momentum
v1.43 · 4d ago
Maintenance- Maintained core compliance feature set.
- Last major update May 2026.
Active Nemesis
Customer Management - Contacts
By 永文 胡
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
BusinessNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
Gathering signals...
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
Loading...
What Are The Key Features?
Automated calculation of overtime rates and hourly wages based on defined employment terms
Real-time logging of working hours and absences via smartphone app
Customizable activity groups for tracking service orders and project-based billing
How much does it cost?
- Free 30-day trial for administrator accounts
- Paid subscription required for ongoing cloud-based time tracking and reporting
Freemium model uses a 30-day trial to convert business owners and HR managers into long-term subscribers.
Who Built It?
Enrichment in progress
Publisher profile available very soon
What other apps does Daniel Gubler make?
What do users think recently?
Analysis in progress, available soon
What is the competitive landscape for Staff Times - My Time?
Where is it available?
Localized markets (8)
How's The Business Market?
Market outlook for this category
Available very soon
Which niche is Staff Times - My Time in?
to track employee time and project attendance
Explore the full Task Management Loggers niche
Every app in this space — 64 tracked, the niche's live rankings, and Marlvel's editorial take on the job-to-be-done.
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
This is the primary market threat as it directly targets the professional time and attendance sector with established GPS and geofencing capabilities.
Contenders(4)
A legacy competitor in the business category that focuses on basic punch-in/out functionality and member management.
Overlaps with the target's resource management functionality by providing multi-zone tracking and manual counting tools.
Differentiators
- Offline processing capability ensures reliable data collection in environments without stable internet connectivity for field staff.
- Multi-zone management allows for granular tracking of different project areas, a feature Staff Times could adopt.
Directly challenges the target's attendance tracking utility through AI-driven analytics and offline capabilities.
Differentiators
- AI-driven inconsistency analysis automatically flags potential time-tracking errors, reducing the manual audit burden for HR managers.
- Electronic document signature integration streamlines the legal compliance process for employee time sheets and labor contracts.
Competes for the professional productivity segment by emphasizing quick entry and professional reporting workflows.
Same space(3)
Occupies the productivity space with a focus on personal scheduling and countdown management.
Shares the productivity category, focusing on event categorization and scheduling for professional planning.
Directly competes for the workforce management audience by combining scheduling with pay calculation features.
Compare Staff Times - My Time against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for Staff Times - My Time
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Automated overtime calculation functions as a B2B barrier against manual spreadsheet-based tracking
- Specialized labor-law compliance tools provide high switching costs for HR departments
Critical Frictions
- Zero rating count on iOS indicates low organic discovery
- Lack of native CRM integration forces manual data entry for project managers
Growth Levers
- Vertical expansion into aviation or maintenance logging
- API-first integration with major CRM platforms to capture the project-tracking workflow
Market Threats
- Generalist CRM tools bundling time-tracking as a secondary feature
- AI-driven audit tools from Genyo reducing the manual labor of HR compliance
What are the next best moves?
Ship native CRM integration because manual data entry is a top friction point → increase enterprise retention
Competitor analysis shows CRM-native tools capture the workflow before Staff Times can engage.
Trade-off: Pause the development of new activity-group customization — CRM integration has higher revenue-retention impact.
A counter-intuitive read
The lack of App Store ratings is not a failure but a signal that Staff Times operates as a B2B sales-led tool where consumer-facing metrics are irrelevant to the bottom line.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- AI-driven inconsistency analysis (available in Genyo but absent here)
- Multi-factor authentication (available in PontoTel but absent here)
- Natural language scheduling (available in Solid Calendar but absent here)
Key Takeaways
Staff Times provides essential compliance utility for small businesses, but its lack of workflow integration leaves it exposed to generalist tools, so the PM must prioritize CRM connectivity to secure the project-tracking funnel.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
The B2B time-tracking market is shifting toward automated audit and compliance tools, which places pressure on manual-entry platforms like Staff Times. The app must transition from a standalone utility to an integrated workflow component to avoid being displaced by generalist CRM tools that bundle time-tracking as a standard feature.
The latest release maintains core compliance functionality without expanding into high-growth AI audit features, signaling a focus on stability over rapid market expansion.
The absence of public user feedback on the latest version limits the ability to iterate on UX, which compounds the risk of churn to feature-rich competitors.