Staying Together vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Staying Together's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Eraser
Contender
Monkey Bongo
Contender
Jump
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperNaquaticNanali Inc.Hiker Games Joint Stock CompanyPangea Software, Inc.Little White Bear Studios, LLCKetchappSKYWALKPlay Infinity Co., Ltd.Plug In DigitalConceptis Ltd.
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGames
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.2 / 54.3 / 54.6 / 54.6 / 54.1 / 54.2 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 5
Ratings Count67555371,795534983920390
PriceFree$1.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 12, 2015Nov 17, 2016Sep 5, 2016Oct 29, 2011Nov 3, 2016Dec 18, 2014Feb 20, 2022Jan 31, 2018Sep 16, 2025Jan 2, 2013
Last UpdatedSep 15, 2017Apr 8, 2024Sep 5, 2016Dec 22, 2025Nov 13, 2016Dec 18, 2014May 17, 2024Oct 13, 2025Dec 9, 2025Apr 16, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositive------positivepositiveexcellent
Score75/100------85/10075/10085/100
Praises
  • Innovative dual-character puzzle mechanics require critical thinking and provide a refreshing gameplay experience
------
  • Minimalist, distraction-free gameplay loop
  • Soothing audio and visual design creates a relaxing experience for casual puzzle players
  • Addictive puzzle mechanics provide a satisfying challenge for nature and ecology enthusiasts
  • Fair monetization model allows for extensive free play before purchasing additional content
  • The absence of intrusive advertisements creates a relaxing and focused environment for logic puzzle enthusiasts
Complaints
  • Inconsistent control responsiveness during complex maneuvers causes accidental pauses and movement errors
------
  • Lack of meta-progression and content variety
  • Persistent application crashes during startup or gameplay disrupt the user experience
  • Inability to access purchased biome content while playing in offline mode
  • Technical glitches prevent the placement of natural wonders in specific biomes
  • The game logic occasionally fails to recognize valid alternative solutions for certain puzzle configurations
Requests
  • Additional level content is requested to extend the gameplay experience beyond the initial set
-------
  • Expanded creative mode options to allow for larger and more complex terrain builds
  • Implementation of a confirmation button to prevent accidental tile placement during zooming
  • Players request a feature to mark squares with custom symbols to assist in complex deduction processes
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Unique dual-character control mechanic creates a distinct gameplay identity.
  • High-quality piano soundtrack sustains a relaxing atmosphere during difficult sessions.
--
  • AirPlay integration extends session duration via living room play
  • Universal binary maximizes reach across Apple hardware
  • Minimalist movement loop provides low-friction entry point
  • Handcrafted level design ensures distinct puzzle challenges
  • Minimalist flat design lowers entry barrier
  • Hazard-based restart mechanic forces high-focus gameplay
  • Star-collection system provides clear completionist goals
  • Physics-based mechanics provide a tactile feedback loop
  • Om Nom IP drives immediate user recognition
  • Ad-free model reduces churn friction
  • Non-rotatable block mechanic forces strategic depth
  • Minimalist design reduces cognitive load for casual sessions
  • Offline-first architecture ensures consistent access
  • Serene aesthetic creates a high-retention relaxing experience
  • Fair freemium model encourages long-term free-to-paid conversion
  • Offline-first design reduces churn in low-connectivity segments
  • Ad-free environment sustains high user satisfaction
  • Weekly content drops create a recurring habit loop
Weaknesses
  • Inconsistent control responsiveness triggers accidental pause menus during complex maneuvers.
  • Steep difficulty spikes in early levels lead to casual player churn.
  • Technical instability on launch prevents access for a subset of the user base.
--
  • Zero-monetization model prevents reinvestment in live-ops
  • 50-level content cap limits long-term retention
  • No cloud-save functionality
  • Lack of social retention loops
  • Minimalist aesthetic risks appearing dated
  • No cloud-save functionality
  • Lack of social leaderboards
  • 60-level content cap restricts lifetime value
  • Lack of persistent meta-progression
  • Episodic content delivery trails category leaders
  • Limited live-ops frequency
  • No meta-progression loop limits long-term retention
  • Ad-supported model lacks premium-tier diversification
  • Limited content variety compared to event-driven rivals
  • Startup crashes on both mobile platforms
  • Purchased content fails to load in offline mode
  • Placement bugs in marine and dinosaur biomes
  • Rigid solution validation frustrates power users
  • Interface struggles with zoom on small screens
Pricingfreemiumpaidfreefreefreefreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreemium
Momentum----ZombieZombie--MaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence----1 versions, 1 majors/6mo1 versions--3 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~67d avg4 versions, ~45d avg

Compare Staying Together head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Staying Together, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0