MARLVEL

Subs & More vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Subs & More's closest competitors: identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Subs & More
This App
Uber Eats: Food & Groceries
Nemesis
Get Eazy
Contender
Radoo: Delivery Local
Contender
ChowNow: Local Food Ordering
Contender
Caviar - Order Food Delivery
Contender
Konnichiwa Sushi
Peer
CookingPal - Connected Cooking
Peer
El Taller
Peer
Fermenters Friend
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperWeeviUber Technologies, Inc.Localites Private LimitedRadware LabsChowNowCaviar, Inc.koodikrokoTecPal Ltd.Orionsoft SpABlaze Software
CategoryFood & DrinkFood & DrinkShoppingFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkUtilities
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.0 / 54.8 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.0 / 54.2 / 55.0 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count510,546,72715625,153170,8544512
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 17, 2022Mar 1, 2016Feb 27, 2022May 19, 2020Jun 13, 2017Dec 4, 2014Dec 1, 2020Jun 18, 2021Sep 21, 2020Jun 26, 2015
Last UpdatedJan 23, 2025Jul 13, 2026Aug 25, 2025Sep 30, 2024Mar 24, 2026Jul 13, 2026Aug 4, 2023Oct 26, 2023Jan 22, 2026Jun 26, 2015
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--excellent-positivepositive----
Score--85/100-85/10085/100----
Praises--
  • Fast and reliable delivery services across small towns keep local customers consistently satisfied
  • Diverse service offerings including groceries and professional tasks create a comprehensive local utility
  • Competitive pricing and frequent promotional offers drive high value perception for daily users
-
  • Fair commission structure
  • Exclusive restaurant selection
----
Complaints--
  • Unprofessional communication etiquette from delivery personnel creates friction during the order fulfillment process
  • Occasional delivery delays disrupt the expected service quality for time-sensitive food orders
-
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking
  • High delivery fees
----
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Direct communication via WhatsApp integration
  • Commission-free model for local restaurants
  • Global driver network sustains delivery velocity across hundreds of cities
  • Multi-category marketplace integrates grocery and pharmacy, increasing wallet share per user
  • Multi-category delivery model increases total addressable market per user session
  • In-app wallet locks capital into the platform to incentivize repeat orders
-
  • Fair commission structure functions as a B2B distribution barrier into independent restaurant partnerships
  • 24/7 human support creates a trust-based retention loop
  • Curated restaurant partnerships function as a barrier to entry for mass-market aggregators
  • DashPass integration provides a recurring revenue mechanism for high-frequency users
-
  • Hardware-software integration enables remote appliance control
  • Weekly recipe updates sustain content freshness
  • Boutique artisanal brand identity differentiates from mass-market chains
  • Specialized dietary menu captures high-intent niche segments
  • Brand-aligned utility drives trust for Hillbilby Cultured Foods
  • Precise salt-ratio calculation solves specific DIY fermentation pain points
Weaknesses
  • Zero rating count on Android platform
  • Lacks real-time order tracking infrastructure
  • Automated support systems trigger high-frequency refund complaints
  • Premium subscription pricing creates a barrier for price-sensitive casual users
  • Unprofessional delivery staff behavior creates friction during order fulfillment
  • Inconsistent delivery timing for time-sensitive food orders
-
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking relative to logistics-heavy rivals
  • Limited restaurant availability compared to major aggregators
  • Delivery fees are a primary frustration theme in user reviews
  • Limited geographic availability compared to mass-market rivals
-
  • Hardware-locked functionality restricts user acquisition
  • Low review count (1) indicates weak social proof
  • Absence of a gamified loyalty engine
  • 0-star rating on Android indicates poor platform-specific performance
  • Zero persistent logging functionality limits repeat usage
  • Low review volume (2 total) indicates poor organic discovery
  • No cloud-sync for user recipes
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreefreefreemiumfreefreefreefree
MomentumZombieIntense-Maintenance-IntenseSteadyZombieMaintenanceZombie
Update Cadence2 versions, ~0d avg5 versions, ~6d avg-5 versions-5 versions, ~4d avg5 versions2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~55d avg1 versions

Compare Subs & More head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Subs & More, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0