MARLVEL

ТМ Щедрик vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against ТМ Щедрик's closest competitors: identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

ТМ Щедрик
This App
Uber Eats: Food & Groceries
Nemesis
Get Eazy
Contender
Stella's Crepes
Contender
Caviar - Order Food Delivery
Contender
ChowNow: Local Food Ordering
Contender
Blue Nile Injera
Peer
Tare: Ingredient Converter
Peer
When Was This Opened?
Peer
Boss Griddle Recipes
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperiThinkersUber Technologies, Inc.Localites Private LimitedCrmb, LLCCaviar, Inc.ChowNowBerhane Asbu AsmelashCameron McconnellChristopher RomaniFlorencia Martigani
CategoryFood & DrinkFood & DrinkShoppingFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & Drink
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.8 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 51.0 / 5
Ratings Count110,546,72712170,84825,1631111
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99Free
Release DateNov 21, 2023Mar 1, 2016Feb 27, 2022Dec 20, 2023Dec 4, 2014Jun 13, 2017Mar 5, 2026Mar 26, 2026Jan 2, 2026Nov 29, 2023
Last UpdatedJan 30, 2026Jul 13, 2026Aug 25, 2025Jan 30, 2024Jul 13, 2026Mar 24, 2026Mar 6, 2026May 4, 2026Jan 2, 2026Nov 29, 2023
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--excellent-positivepositive----
Score--85/100-85/10085/100----
Praises--
  • Fast and reliable delivery services across small towns keep local customers consistently satisfied
  • Diverse service offerings including groceries and professional tasks create a comprehensive local utility
  • Competitive pricing and frequent promotional offers drive high value perception for daily users
-
  • Exclusive restaurant selection
  • Fair commission structure
----
Complaints--
  • Unprofessional communication etiquette from delivery personnel creates friction during the order fulfillment process
  • Occasional delivery delays disrupt the expected service quality for time-sensitive food orders
-
  • High delivery fees
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking
----
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Direct manufacturer-to-consumer pricing model removes third-party aggregator margins
  • Hyper-local operational focus enables personalized service within Omelyan
  • Global driver network sustains delivery velocity across hundreds of cities
  • Multi-category marketplace integrates grocery and pharmacy, increasing wallet share per user
  • Multi-category delivery model increases total addressable market per user session
  • In-app wallet locks capital into the platform to incentivize repeat orders
  • Direct-to-consumer ordering bypasses third-party commission fees
  • Curated restaurant partnerships function as a barrier to entry for mass-market aggregators
  • DashPass integration provides a recurring revenue mechanism for high-frequency users
  • Fair commission structure functions as a B2B distribution barrier into independent restaurant partnerships
  • 24/7 human support creates a trust-based retention loop
  • Digital loyalty system incentivizes repeat in-shop visits
  • Direct customer relationship fosters brand intimacy
  • Offline-first architecture enables use in commercial kitchen environments
  • USDA-verified density database creates a technical switching cost
  • One-time purchase model avoids subscription-fatigue churn
--
Weaknesses
  • 0 rating count on Android platform indicates low adoption
  • Lack of loyalty program or one-tap reordering increases churn risk
  • Automated support systems trigger high-frequency refund complaints
  • Premium subscription pricing creates a barrier for price-sensitive casual users
  • Unprofessional delivery staff behavior creates friction during order fulfillment
  • Inconsistent delivery timing for time-sensitive food orders
  • Lack of dietary filtering or in-store payment integration
  • Delivery fees are a primary frustration theme in user reviews
  • Limited geographic availability compared to mass-market rivals
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking relative to logistics-heavy rivals
  • Limited restaurant availability compared to major aggregators
  • Manual in-shop credit settlement creates user friction
  • Lack of mobile ordering or payment integration
  • Single-platform availability limits reach
  • Lack of cloud-sync prevents cross-device recipe management
  • Free-to-paid conversion lacks clear trial-to-purchase funnel
--
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreefreepaidpaidfree
MomentumMaintenanceIntense--Intense-MaintenanceIntense--
Update Cadence5 versions, ~51d avg5 versions, ~6d avg--5 versions, ~4d avg-2 versions, ~5d avg5 versions--

Compare ТМ Щедрик head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ТМ Щедрик, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0