Matthias Kluett
Publisher DNA
What defines Matthias Kluett?
AI intelligence is not yet available for Matthias Kluett. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does Matthias Kluett ship?
Apps
1 app analysed
Your blood pressure tracker app - Start analyzing now - Made in Germany
The interface allows for quick and efficient data entry during daily health monitoring routines
- Manual tracking of blood pressure and weight provides actionable health insights for doctor consultations
- Intrusive full-screen advertisements disrupt the user experience and make navigation difficult for free users
Distributed across 12 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 1 of 1 app with localized market data · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- Brazil1 / 1
- Mexico1 / 1
- United States1 / 1
Europe (7)
- France1 / 1
- Germany1 / 1
- Italy1 / 1
- Netherlands1 / 1
- Portugal1 / 1
›+2 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 1
- Sweden1 / 1
Asia-Pacific (2)
- Japan1 / 1
- South Korea1 / 1
Core markets (1/1 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
0
Positive apps
1
Neutral / mixed
0
Negative apps
45/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does Matthias Kluett compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
Both apps target users managing hypertension through blood pressure logging, but they diverge on the balance between automated device integration and simplified manual entry.
Contenders(10)
Both apps target hypertension management, but Hilo relies on proprietary hardware integration while AVAX focuses on software-based manual or third-party Bluetooth device entry.
Both apps target hypertension patients requiring clinical-grade health logging and reporting, competing directly for users seeking to manage chronic conditions via mobile devices.
Both apps target hypertension management by providing digital logging and tracking for blood pressure readings.
Both applications target individuals managing hypertension by providing free digital logging and reporting tools for cardiovascular health metrics.
Both apps target the same hypertension management demographic by offering manual and Bluetooth-synced blood pressure logging with report generation for medical consultation.
Both apps target individuals managing chronic heart health conditions, with overlapping functionality in blood pressure and health data logging.
Both apps target users managing hypertension through Bluetooth-enabled vitals logging and medical report generation.
Both applications target users managing cardiovascular health by providing digital logging for blood pressure and vital signs.
Both apps target chronic hypertension management, but AVAX provides automated Bluetooth hardware integration while the rival relies on manual entry for multi-user households.
Both apps target individuals managing chronic hypertension by providing manual logging and vital sign tracking tools for daily health monitoring.
Same space(9)
Occupies the same cardiovascular tracking space but relies on manual logging and camera-based pulse detection.
Serves as a specialized alternative for glucose tracking, capturing the diabetes-management segment that overlaps with multi-metric tracking.
Serves as a multi-metric health tracker that uses camera-based measurement to monitor heart rate and blood pressure.
Functions as a medication-focused companion that allows for secondary measurement logging alongside pill reminders.
Provides an alternative for users seeking all-in-one cardiovascular tracking without external hardware requirements.
Targets the same blood pressure tracking audience but relies on a subscription-gated model for core logging features.
Acts as a complementary health companion by focusing on medication adherence rather than primary blood pressure recording.
Targets the same cardiovascular wellness audience by offering camera-based pulse detection instead of Bluetooth hardware integration.
Offers a minimalist alternative for manual blood pressure recording, focusing on simplicity over hardware connectivity.
New entrants(1)
Appeals to the same user base by prioritizing data sovereignty through local-only storage rather than cloud-based sync.