Nutracheck
Calorie Counter +
Publisher DNA
What defines Nutracheck?
AI intelligence is not yet available for Nutracheck. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does Nutracheck ship?
Apps
1 app analysed
Nutracheck food diary, macro & calorie deficit tracker with barcode scanning
Barcode scanning reduces logging friction for daily users
- Barcode scanning and extensive food database make tracking daily calorie intake simple and accurate
- The free tier limits daily food entries to five items, which users find restrictive and impractical
Single-market publisher, every app ships only to United States.
Based on 1 of 1 app with localized market data Β· last scanned .
Americas (1)
- United States1 / 1
Core markets (1/1 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
1
Positive apps
0
Neutral / mixed
0
Negative apps
75/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does Nutracheck compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
Both apps target weight management users with calorie and macro tracking, competing directly for the same user base through freemium models.
Contenders(10)
Both apps target weight management users with food databases, but Calorie Counter by fatsecret captures the casual segment by offering an unrestricted free tier that Calorie Counter + gates behind a five-item limit.
Fitia competes for the same weight management audience by offering diverse logging methods, including AI photo scanning and voice input, which directly challenges the manual entry friction found in Calorie Counter +.
Both apps target the weight management market with calorie and nutrition tracking, competing directly for users who prioritize logging speed and nutritional accuracy.
Hevy competes for the same health-conscious user base by offering free, ad-free workout tracking, which captures the fitness-focused segment of the Calorie Counter + audience.
Cal AI competes by replacing manual entry with image recognition, directly targeting the friction points of manual logging found in Calorie Counter +.
Both apps target weight management users with calorie and macro tracking, competing directly for the same user base through different logging mechanisms: manual verified database versus AI-powered photo analysis.
Both apps target weight management users, competing for daily logging habits through distinct approaches: verified database accuracy versus gamified AI interaction.
Both apps compete for weight management users, but the rival captures casual users through a fully free utility model while Calorie Counter + restricts daily logging behind a subscription.
Both apps compete for the same daily health-tracking habit within the fitness category, forcing users to choose between nutritional logging and activity monitoring.
Yazio competes for the same weight management audience by offering AI-driven tracking that directly addresses the manual entry friction found in the Calorie Counter + free tier.
Same space(4)
known for
This app focuses on brisk walking as a public health intervention, providing a non-commercial alternative for activity tracking alongside nutritional logging.
This app provides clinical biometric monitoring like blood pressure and glucose that complements the nutritional focus of Calorie Counter +.
This app offers coaching-based weight management that avoids strict calorie logging, serving users who find the Calorie Counter + diary interface burdensome.
This app targets the physical activity component of weight management, allowing users to track movement while using Calorie Counter + for food data.
New entrants(1)
This app directly competes with the core logging functionality of Calorie Counter + by using image recognition to lower entry friction.