MARLVEL

Amsterdam Guide by Civitatis vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Amsterdam Guide by Civitatis's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Amsterdam Guide by Civitatis
This App
Metropolitan Museum of Art NYC
Nemesis
Prince George Transit
Contender
Turin Travel Guide .
Contender
Seoul Travel Guide
Contender
Marrakech Travel Guide .
Contender
SimOptions: eSIM Travel, Data
Peer
TiquetesBaratos
Peer
VBB Bus & Bahn: Route planner
Peer
HersheyResorts
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperCIVITATIS TOURS S.L.Gonzalo JuarezHuge Holdings LtdGonzalo JuarezGonzalo JuarezGonzalo JuarezMWS HK LIMITEDPriceTravel HoldingVBB Verkehrsverbund Berlin-Brandenburg GmbHHershey Entertainment and Resorts Company
CategoryTravelEducationTravelTravelTravelTravelTravelTravelTravelTravel
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.0 / 54.2 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.4 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 51.7 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count51,306110468332191199
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJun 3, 2016Mar 28, 2015Sep 11, 2012Feb 24, 2010Jan 23, 2010Jul 30, 2010May 31, 2024Jul 24, 2023Jan 18, 2011Mar 26, 2025
Last UpdatedNov 23, 2023Mar 21, 2023Feb 2, 2026Jan 9, 2026Jan 23, 2026Jan 23, 2026Apr 18, 2026May 4, 2026Aug 28, 2024Apr 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--excellentexcellent-positivepositive-negative-
Score--100/10090/100-80/10085/100-20/100-
Praises-----
  • Offline utility
  • Ease of purchasing destination-specific data plans
  • Automated compatibility check
---
Complaints-----
  • Content freshness
  • Difficulty with manual installation steps
  • Occasional regional connectivity issues
-
  • Technical instability and crashes
-
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Civitatis booking engine integration drives direct conversion from guide content to paid excursions.
  • Offline-first architecture ensures utility in international roaming environments with limited data.
  • Singular focus on a world-class institution provides a distraction-free experience for museum-specific navigation.
  • Lightweight architecture minimizes cognitive load for daily commuters
  • Hyper-local focus reduces UI complexity compared to general transit apps
  • 100% offline-first architecture ensures utility in areas with poor cellular connectivity
  • AR-based discovery provides an immersive exploration tool for urban environments
  • Offline-first architecture eliminates roaming-cost friction for international visitors
  • AR discovery tool provides an immersive, tech-forward experience
  • Granular itinerary model offers immediate utility for short-term travelers
  • 100% offline-first architecture removes roaming-charge friction
  • Specialized AR tool provides localized sightseeing immersion
  • Itinerary-based design simplifies trip planning for first-time visitors
  • Automated device compatibility check reduces activation friction
  • Marketplace model provides broad geographic coverage without inventory overhead
  • Localized payment integrations function as a B2B distribution barrier
  • Curated travel packages offer higher value for local vacationers
  • Hyper-local transit data accuracy for Berlin and Brandenburg region
  • Property-specific navigation maps provide immediate utility for guests across three distinct resort locations.
Weaknesses
  • Static content model lacks the real-time updates found in modern travel utilities.
  • Lack of in-app booking management forces users to exit the guide to finalize reservations.
  • Static content architecture lacks real-time updates.
  • No social discovery or gamified museum challenges to drive repeat usage.
  • Static schedule data lacks real-time updates
  • Single-review volume indicates low active user engagement
  • No integrated mapping or navigation tools
  • 10 total ratings indicate low discoverability
  • No real-time data integration makes the guide static compared to modern transit apps
  • IAP-only monetization model lacks high-margin booking commissions
  • No cloud-sync for user-saved itineraries
  • 46-review count limits social proof compared to institutional rivals
  • 8 total ratings indicate low user engagement
  • Static content model lacks real-time updates
  • Interface design feels dated compared to modern travel apps
  • Lack of native call/text services limits utility
  • No loyalty or reward program to incentivize repeat purchases
  • Zero Android market presence
  • Lack of loyalty program to incentivize repeat bookings
  • Regional inventory restricts geographic breadth
  • 1.68-star rating on iOS indicates severe technical instability
  • Lack of modern interface parity with national competitors
  • Lack of mobile food ordering creates guest friction during peak dining hours compared to industry peers.
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreefreefreefreefree
Momentum------Maintenance-Zombie-
Update Cadence------1 versions-1 versions, 1 majors/6mo-

Compare Amsterdam Guide by Civitatis head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amsterdam Guide by Civitatis, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0