filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperARTTIC CO., LTD.DAZZ PTE. LTD.鑫 李梓杰 张Visual Supply CompanySHANTANU PTE. LTD.SNOW CorporationPrequel Inc.
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count352106,4041225,539273,8372,423,30653,886332,806
PriceUSD2.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 9, 2022Aug 17, 2018Jun 15, 2019Jun 4, 2021Jun 6, 2013Jun 11, 2015Aug 14, 2021Mar 29, 2018
Last UpdatedNov 18, 2025Apr 23, 2026Oct 15, 2021Apr 25, 2026May 1, 2026May 5, 2026Apr 16, 2026Mar 27, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositiveexcellent--negativeexcellentmixednegative
Score85/10085/100--25/10085/10035/10025/100
Praises
  • Authentic analog aesthetic
  • Integration with system-level camera hardware allows for instant launch and professional shooting workflows
--
  • Creative expression through photo editing tools remains a core retention driver for long-term users
  • Simple and intuitive editing tools allow creators to produce content without complex learning curves
  • High quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual mobile users
  • High quality visual effects and creative tools provide aesthetic value for photography enthusiasts
Complaints
  • Stability and performance
  • Image processing errors and artifacts appear in high-contrast shots on current generation hardware
--
  • Aggressive paywall expansion locks previously free editing tools behind a high-cost annual subscription model
  • Export failures and conversion errors disrupt long-form editing sessions on mobile devices
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features forces unwanted subscription costs on long-term users
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic editing features forces unwanted subscription commitments for casual users
  • Arbitrary usage caps on premium effects limit utility even for active paid subscribers
Requests
  • Granular editing controls
  • Ability to bookmark or favorite specific camera filters for faster access during shooting
--
  • One-time purchase option requested as an alternative to the current high-cost annual subscription
  • Expanded library of default music and font options to support diverse creative projects
  • Ad-supported access to premium features would allow casual users to utilize tools without full subscriptions
  • Improved transparency regarding free versus premium feature availability within the interface
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Exclusive influencer-led aesthetic creates a unique value proposition
  • Metadata-display builds professional photography authority
  • Paid-upfront model avoids ad-clutter friction
  • System-level hardware integration replaces default camera on hardware-mapped triggers
  • High-fidelity film emulations provide authentic vintage aesthetics without requiring expensive physical hardware
  • One-time purchase model for premium features builds trust compared to subscription-only competitors
--
  • Film-emulation preset library functions as a brand-identity moat
  • Spaces collaborative galleries drive social network effects
  • Intuitive UI lowers barrier to entry
  • Offline editing capability provides distinct advantage
  • Generous free-tier asset library
  • AI Yearbook virality drives organic install velocity
  • All-in-one suite reduces user need for multi-app workflows
  • Curated aesthetic library sustains brand identity
  • D3D motion-graphics provide unique creative output
  • High-quality filter library drives organic social sharing
Weaknesses
  • Android version priced 16% higher than iOS
  • Lack of AI-driven retouching tools
  • No cloud-save functionality for user projects
  • Image processing artifacts in high-contrast modes on current generation hardware
  • Inconsistent file storage behavior leads to lost photos for free users
  • Subscription cancellation friction within the platform interface
--
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.7-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific technical debt
  • Export failures on high-resolution projects
  • Excessive storage consumption
  • Ad placement friction
  • Premium tier pricing exceeds category median
  • Restrictive export-gating triggers high-frequency churn complaints
  • Premium tier at category-median pricing
  • 10-use weekly limit on AI effects
  • Frequent crashes during large library access
Pricingpaidsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumsubscription
MomentumSteadyActiveIntenseIntenseActiveActiveActiveActive
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~23d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~21d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~23d avg

Compare filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by filmhwa - @hwa.min's filter, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0