Retake AI Face & Selfie Editor vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Retake AI Face & Selfie Editor's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Blend Photos
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperDEEP FLOW SOFTWARE SERVICESPicsArt, Inc.C&A Marketing, Inc.Pablex Studio 3DAlan CushwayTAPUNIVERSE LLCPanda Apps LimitedPhoto & Video Editors - Instant SolutionHDY StudioShanghai Yuhuan Technology Co., LTD
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoEntertainmentEntertainmentPhoto & VideoGraphics & DesignPhoto & VideoPhotographyPhotographyPhoto & Video
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.4 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count47,9501,192,6736,5761,49955,0494542,97764020,4951,632
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$2.99FreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 1, 2023Jan 2, 2013May 5, 2020Oct 21, 2016Dec 16, 2013Mar 3, 2023Dec 13, 2016Oct 31, 2015Oct 8, 2022Mar 3, 2025
Last UpdatedMay 19, 2026Jun 30, 2026Jan 21, 2026Apr 28, 2026Feb 25, 2026Jul 31, 2025Apr 27, 2026May 12, 2026May 9, 2026Mar 16, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativenegativepositive-positivepositivemixed--mixed
Score25/10025/10085/100-85/10085/10045/100--55/100
Praises
  • High quality photo editing results provide a satisfying and professional aesthetic for casual users
  • Extensive library of editing effects and creative tools provides unmatched artistic versatility
  • Simplified, task-oriented UX that avoids the feature bloat found in complex editors
-
  • Extensive free layout library
  • Ease of use for quick edits
  • Professional cinematography tools provide high quality output comparable to expensive dedicated hardware
  • Manual white balance and exposure controls allow for precise aesthetic adjustments during filming
--
  • Vintage camera filters provide high quality aesthetic results for social media content creation
Complaints
  • Aggressive and misleading subscription pricing models frustrate users who expected a lower cost
  • Difficult cancellation processes and unresponsive support lead to unauthorized recurring charges for users
  • Technical instability and data loss prevent users from accessing purchased pro features consistently
  • Aggressive advertising and forced pop-ups disrupt the editing workflow and degrade user experience
  • Missing granular color correction and skin-smoothing tools
-
  • Subscription-gated assets
  • Ad frequency during export
  • External microphone connectivity failures prevent audio recording after the latest update
  • Application crashes during recording sessions lead to significant loss of creative work
--
  • Aggressive monetization shifts lock previously free camera filters behind a subscription paywall
Requests
  • Dark mode interface requested to improve usability during late night photo editing sessions
  • Option to disable AI-driven features and content for users preferring traditional editing tools
--
  • Improved export workflow
-
  • Vertical shooting interface layout to accommodate modern social media content creation
--
  • Reversion of popular camera filters to free status to restore the original user experience
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Personalized AI model generation creates high switching costs
  • Realistic output differentiates from filter-heavy incumbents
  • Direct social-sharing flows drive organic install velocity
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • 60M+ sticker library functions as a community-driven acquisition moat
  • Hardware-native integration creates a specific, high-utility bridge for physical printing
  • Task-oriented UX minimizes friction for non-professional users
-
  • 1000+ layout library sustains organic install velocity
  • Unsplash/Pixabay integration reduces content-creation friction
  • High rating baseline (4.84) drives App Store conversion
  • One-tap blending mechanism lowers entry barrier
  • AI-driven subject isolation differentiates from basic grids
  • Professional-grade manual control depth sustains prosumer interest
  • External hardware compatibility creates high switching costs
  • One-time purchase model differentiates from subscription-heavy rivals
--
  • Real-time effect preview reduces editing friction
  • Retro imaging simulation drives organic acquisition
Weaknesses
  • Subscription pricing transparency issues drive high churn
  • Difficult cancellation flows trigger negative sentiment
  • Technical instability causes pro-feature access loss
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.6★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Aggressive ad-frequency triggers high-churn complaints
  • Premium tier missing granular HSL/beauty tools
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user demand
  • 0.5★ rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
-
  • Yearly subscription model lacks monthly flexibility
  • No generative AI features to compete with modern suites
  • Export workflow requires manual steps
  • Ad-heavy export flow increases churn
  • Lack of social community layer limits retention
  • High-frequency crash reports during recording sessions
  • External microphone connectivity regressions post-update
  • Non-intuitive file management UX for casual users
--
  • Subscription-only model triggers high refund rates
  • Ad-loading failures block premium feature access
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreemiumpaidfreefreefreemium
MomentumActiveIntenseMaintenance--ActiveMaintenance--Maintenance
Update Cadence5 versions, ~9d avg5 versions, ~5d avg2 versions, ~68d avg--5 versions5 versions, ~235d avg--3 versions, ~5d avg

Compare Retake AI Face & Selfie Editor head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Retake AI Face & Selfie Editor, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0