Supremacy: World War 3 vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Supremacy: World War 3's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperStillfront Supremacy GmbHLilith GamesLilith GamesLONG TECH NETWORK LIMITEDFunPlus International AGPlarium Global LtdChengDu Starunion Interactive Entertainment Technology Co., Ltd.Gameloft
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGames
PlatformAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.7 / 54.5 / 53.9 / 54.6 / 54.9 / 54.5 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count73,48482,679184,87518,267381,543206,34323,226188,981
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateSep 3, 2020Mar 15, 2021Sep 20, 2018Feb 19, 2018Aug 30, 2019Jul 10, 2020Jun 23, 2021Mar 16, 2016
Last UpdatedApr 30, 2026Apr 8, 2026Apr 10, 2026May 1, 2026Apr 16, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 22, 2026Apr 7, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativemixedpositivenegativemixedmixedmixednegative
Score25/10065/10064/10025/10045/10055/10035/10035/100
Praises
  • Strategic depth and military simulation mechanics provide an immersive experience for tactical planning enthusiasts
  • Addictive strategy gameplay loop provides high entertainment value for casual mobile gamers
  • Social & Strategic Depth
  • Longevity and Content
  • Core survival gameplay loop provides long-term entertainment for dedicated strategy enthusiasts
  • Engaging Gameplay
  • Social/Alliance Features
  • Fast-paced combat and mech customization mechanics provide high replay value for casual players
  • Immersive underground world design with detailed visuals keeps players engaged for long sessions
  • Social alliance features provide a strong sense of community and cooperative gameplay
  • Consistent event updates provide fresh content for dedicated long-term players
  • Disney-themed character collection loop provides a relaxing and engaging experience for long-term fans
Complaints
  • Aggressive pay-to-win mechanics allow high-spending players to dominate matches with superior units and instant upgrades
  • Frequent server crashes and connection errors disrupt active combat and cause loss of progress
  • Aggressive monetization and power creep create an unfair environment for non-paying players
  • Pay-to-Win Imbalance
  • Misleading Advertising
  • Aggressive pay-to-win monetization structures force players into spending to remain competitive against whales
  • Aggressive Pay-to-Win Mechanics
  • Poor Customer Support
  • Aggressive pay-to-win matchmaking pairs free players against high-spending opponents with superior gear
  • Aggressive pay-to-win mechanics force spending to remain competitive in battle modes
  • Poor account management and login issues lead to total progress loss
  • Toxic player behavior and harassment in global chat remain unaddressed by support
  • Aggressive ad frequency post-update disrupts core gameplay and makes the experience feel unplayable
Requests
  • Dedicated game modes for non-paying players to ensure fair competition without gold-based advantages
  • Improved matchmaking logic to prevent unfair pairings between free players and high-spending whales
-
  • Human-led customer service channels are needed to address account recovery and missing purchase disputes
-
  • Skill-based matchmaking systems are needed to ensure fair competition for non-paying players
  • Improved account recovery and cross-platform login options for existing players
  • More effective moderation tools to report and remove abusive players
  • Paid ad-free experience option requested to remove intrusive interruptions during gameplay
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Long-duration match cycles drive daily login habits
  • Deep research tree creates high switching costs
  • High-fidelity military aesthetic sustains player immersion
  • Deep unit customization creates long-term resource sinks
  • Alliance system drives social network effects
  • Proprietary Infinite Zoom map technology
  • Real-time, non-instanced RTS combat mechanics
  • Deep historical IP and RPG commander talent trees
  • Alliance-based social network effects drive high-frequency login habits
  • Deep base-building complexity sustains long-term engagement for core strategy enthusiasts
  • High-profile IP partnerships (Rambo, Resident Evil)
  • Massive active user base (2.6M+ ratings)
  • Diverse gameplay modes (Survival Royale, Puzzle Party)
  • Cross-platform sync via Plarium Play drives session duration
  • Offline-capable engine lowers acquisition barriers in emerging markets
  • High-fidelity visual depth of the ant hill environment sustains player immersion
  • Social alliance network effects reduce churn via community-driven goals
  • Recurring subscription model secures predictable revenue streams
  • Multi-franchise IP library drives long-term retention
  • Quest-driven narrative provides structured casual guidance
Weaknesses
  • Frequent server instability disrupts active combat
  • Pay-to-win monetization drives negative user sentiment
  • Premium currency monetization creates a competitive power gap
  • High frequency of account-sync errors post-update
  • Misleading ad creative causes early-funnel churn
  • Aggressive P2W monetization causing F2P churn
  • Misalignment between marketing ads and actual gameplay
  • High-friction onboarding with a 'very long' tutorial
  • $24.99/month subscription tier sits significantly above the strategy-game median
  • Automated support tickets close without resolution, causing high-value player churn
  • Extreme P2W perception among long-term players
  • Poor customer support responsiveness
  • Polarizing sexualized character content
  • 0.63 rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Matchmaking imbalances drive high-frequency pay-to-win complaints
  • Total progress loss during device transitions drives significant churn
  • Lack of account binding options creates high-friction user experience
  • Aggressive monetization gating progression alienates non-spending players
  • Aggressive ad frequency disrupts core gameplay
  • Critical account synchronization failures cause progress loss
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumActiveActiveActiveActiveIntenseActiveActiveActive
Update Cadence5 versions, ~17d avg4 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~11d avg4 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~11d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~4d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~4d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~7d avg

Compare Supremacy: World War 3 head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Supremacy: World War 3, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0