Call of Dragons vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Call of Dragons's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperFarlight GamesLilith GamesLONG TECH NETWORK LIMITEDChengDu Starunion Interactive Entertainment Technology Co., Ltd.FunPlus International AGScopely, Inc.Plarium Global LtdMiniclip.comthatgamecompany
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGames
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.5 / 53.9 / 54.5 / 54.6 / 54.6 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count34,049184,87518,26723,226381,543303,282206,343202,052261,153
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 28, 2023Sep 20, 2018Feb 19, 2018Jun 23, 2021Aug 30, 2019Mar 28, 2018Jul 10, 2020Sep 22, 2020Jul 21, 2019
Last UpdatedApr 22, 2026Apr 10, 2026May 1, 2026Apr 22, 2026Apr 16, 2026Apr 8, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 8, 2026Apr 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedpositivenegativemixedmixedmixedmixedmixedmixed
Score55/10064/10025/10035/10045/10042/10055/10055/10055/100
Praises
  • Real-time unit control mechanics provide a dynamic and engaging battle experience for strategy enthusiasts
  • Social & Strategic Depth
  • Longevity and Content
  • Core survival gameplay loop provides long-term entertainment for dedicated strategy enthusiasts
  • Immersive underground world design with detailed visuals keeps players engaged for long sessions
  • Social alliance features provide a strong sense of community and cooperative gameplay
  • Consistent event updates provide fresh content for dedicated long-term players
  • Engaging Gameplay
  • Social/Alliance Features
  • Engaging Gameplay and Content
  • Frequent Updates
  • Fast-paced combat and mech customization mechanics provide high replay value for casual players
  • Gameplay Enjoyment
  • Atmospheric visual design and peaceful audio composition create a relaxing escape for daily players
Complaints
  • Aggressive pay-to-win monetization structures create insurmountable power gaps between free and spending players
  • Pay-to-Win Imbalance
  • Misleading Advertising
  • Aggressive pay-to-win monetization structures force players into spending to remain competitive against whales
  • Aggressive pay-to-win mechanics force spending to remain competitive in battle modes
  • Poor account management and login issues lead to total progress loss
  • Toxic player behavior and harassment in global chat remain unaddressed by support
  • Aggressive Pay-to-Win Mechanics
  • Poor Customer Support
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Technical Instability
  • Aggressive pay-to-win matchmaking pairs free players against high-spending opponents with superior gear
  • Unfair Matchmaking and Scripting
  • Technical Issues and Glitches
  • Technical instability including frequent crashes and server splits disrupts the core gameplay experience
Requests
  • Implementation of regional payment methods to support players in underserved international markets
-
  • Human-led customer service channels are needed to address account recovery and missing purchase disputes
  • Improved account recovery and cross-platform login options for existing players
  • More effective moderation tools to report and remove abusive players
--
  • Skill-based matchmaking systems are needed to ensure fair competition for non-paying players
-
  • Account retrieval features are needed to recover lost progress and previously purchased cosmetics
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Real-time unit control mechanics provide a distinct tactical advantage over static genre competitors.
  • Alliance-based Behemoth summoning drives social network effects that increase long-term player retention.
  • Proprietary Infinite Zoom map technology
  • Real-time, non-instanced RTS combat mechanics
  • Deep historical IP and RPG commander talent trees
  • Alliance-based social network effects drive high-frequency login habits
  • Deep base-building complexity sustains long-term engagement for core strategy enthusiasts
  • High-fidelity visual depth of the ant hill environment sustains player immersion
  • Social alliance network effects reduce churn via community-driven goals
  • Recurring subscription model secures predictable revenue streams
  • High-profile IP partnerships (Rambo, Resident Evil)
  • Massive active user base (2.6M+ ratings)
  • Diverse gameplay modes (Survival Royale, Puzzle Party)
  • Tier-1 Marvel IP with high-fidelity character modeling
  • Best-in-class cinematic combat animations
  • Strong Alliance-based social engagement
  • Cross-platform sync via Plarium Play drives session duration
  • Offline-capable engine lowers acquisition barriers in emerging markets
  • Massive user base (980k+ ratings) providing high social proof
  • Strong social meta-game via the Club system
  • High monetization efficiency (#40 Grossing rank)
  • Social-network effects anchored in non-verbal interaction drive daily retention
  • Cross-platform progression removes hardware-based switching costs
Weaknesses
  • Progression gated behind significant financial investment creates a 0.7★ rating gap between free and paying users.
  • Multi-day wait times for basic upgrades discourage casual player retention.
  • Aggressive P2W monetization causing F2P churn
  • Misalignment between marketing ads and actual gameplay
  • High-friction onboarding with a 'very long' tutorial
  • $24.99/month subscription tier sits significantly above the strategy-game median
  • Automated support tickets close without resolution, causing high-value player churn
  • Total progress loss during device transitions drives significant churn
  • Lack of account binding options creates high-friction user experience
  • Aggressive monetization gating progression alienates non-spending players
  • Extreme P2W perception among long-term players
  • Poor customer support responsiveness
  • Polarizing sexualized character content
  • Severe technical instability and frequent app crashes
  • Perceived 'pay-to-win' barriers in late-game meta
  • Dismissive customer support experiences
  • 0.63 rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Matchmaking imbalances drive high-frequency pay-to-win complaints
  • Perceived 'scripted' matchmaking (DDA) causing user frustration
  • Critical technical bugs leading to loss of purchases/data
  • Aggressive pay-to-win mechanics cited by mid-tier players
  • High cosmetic pricing relative to category median
  • Persistent server-split bugs erode the core social experience
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumActiveActiveActiveActiveIntenseIntenseActiveActiveActive
Update Cadence5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~12d avg4 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~11d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~4d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~4d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~6d avg

Compare Call of Dragons head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Call of Dragons, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0