FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperLyrebird StudioFaceApp Technology LimitedPIXOCIAL TECHNOLOGY (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.SNOW CorporationBending Spoons Apps ApSPicsArt, Inc.HUBX
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count48,9001,753,075345,16553,886340,5981,192,6739,356
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 13, 2020Jan 24, 2017Apr 25, 2013Aug 14, 2021Aug 1, 2019Jan 2, 2013Mar 29, 2024
Last UpdatedApr 21, 2026Apr 30, 2026May 14, 2026Apr 16, 2026May 18, 2026Jun 30, 2026May 4, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedmixednegativemixedmixednegativeterrible
Score45/10045/10035/10035/10045/10025/10025/100
Praises
  • Realistic photo transformation results provide high satisfaction for users exploring future aging or hair styles
  • High-quality photo editing tools allow users to refine selfies with natural results
  • High quality photo editing tools provide satisfying results for daily creative content creation
  • High quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual mobile users
  • AI-powered photo enhancement delivers high-quality visual results for blurry or low-resolution images
  • Extensive library of editing effects and creative tools provides unmatched artistic versatility
  • High visual quality of generated videos provides satisfaction for users who successfully complete the process
Complaints
  • Aggressive subscription paywalls and excessive advertisements block core functionality for non-paying users post-update
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic editing features frustrates long-term users
  • Aggressive monetization tactics gate previously free features behind expensive annual subscription paywalls
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features forces unwanted subscription costs on long-term users
  • Excessive advertisement frequency forces users to watch multiple videos before completing a single edit
  • Aggressive advertising and forced pop-ups disrupt the editing workflow and degrade user experience
  • Aggressive monetization via hidden coin costs after subscription payment creates a sense of being scammed
  • Technical failures and processing errors prevent video generation despite successful payment of subscription fees
Requests
  • Slider controls for aging features would allow for more precise and customizable photo transformations
  • Reintroduction of legacy features like face morphing and video editing capabilities
  • Flexible pricing models including monthly options that are more affordable for casual users
  • Ad-supported access to premium features would allow casual users to utilize tools without full subscriptions
  • Reduced advertisement duration or frequency to improve the usability of the free tier
  • Option to disable AI-driven features and content for users preferring traditional editing tools
  • Transparent pricing and free trial access to verify video quality before committing to a subscription
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Realistic neural-network transformation quality [Market Segment]
  • High-virality baby generator acquisition funnel [Feature]
  • Simplified UX for casual users [Interface]
  • Viral social-sharing loops driven by age/gender filters
  • High-fidelity AI engine for photorealistic results
  • Category-leading global chart presence
  • Editors' Choice badge across 30+ markets sustains organic install velocity
  • 800 million user base provides massive data for AI model refinement
  • Broad library of 400+ filters creates high switching costs for casual users
  • AI Yearbook virality drives organic install velocity
  • All-in-one suite reduces user need for multi-app workflows
  • Neural restoration engine provides high-fidelity output
  • Viral before/after sharing drives organic installs
  • Established brand recognition in restoration niche
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • 60M+ sticker library functions as a community-driven acquisition moat
  • Google Veo3 integration provides high-fidelity output
  • Drag-and-drop interface lowers creative barrier
Weaknesses
  • Aggressive subscription paywalls post-update [Monetization]
  • High-friction cancellation flows [Retention]
  • Misleading promotional content vs. actual feature set [Trust]
  • Subscription cost above category median
  • Technical instability in the latest build
  • Subscription-cancellation friction in the UI
  • Premium tier annual plan pricing exceeds category median
  • 0.24-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • Deceptive trial-to-subscription billing complaints erode brand trust
  • Premium tier pricing exceeds category median
  • Restrictive export-gating triggers high-frequency churn complaints
  • High ad-to-value ratio drives churn
  • Technical instability freezes post-ad
  • Aggressive pop-ups disrupt editing flow
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.6★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Aggressive ad-frequency triggers high-churn complaints
  • Hidden coin costs post-subscription drive refund surges
  • Technical instability during generation causes crashes
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscription
MomentumMaintenanceActiveActiveActiveActiveIntenseActive
Update Cadence5 versions, ~30d avg5 versions, ~11d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~15d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, ~8d avg5 versions, ~5d avg5 versions, ~6d avg

Compare FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FaceLab: Face Age, Hair Filter, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0