Diptic vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Diptic's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Diptic
This App
Core Identity
DeveloperPeak SystemsJUPITER PALACE PTE. LTD.IRONTECH LIMITEDVIDEO EDITOR PTE. LTD.Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.Bazaart Ltd.SHANTANU PTE. LTD.HUBX
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.5 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count2,984115,110504,324166,46878,493257,3392,423,3069,356
PriceUSD2.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJun 23, 2010Aug 1, 2012Apr 12, 2016Jun 15, 2012Feb 15, 2011Apr 6, 2012Jun 11, 2015Mar 29, 2024
Last UpdatedFeb 1, 2021Apr 29, 2026May 15, 2026Apr 26, 2026Apr 28, 2026May 2, 2026May 5, 2026May 4, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativenegativeexcellentmixednegativepositiveexcellentterrible
Score25/10035/10085/10045/10025/10075/10085/10025/100
Praises
  • Customizable collage layouts provide creative flexibility for users seeking non-square aspect ratios
  • Long-term utility of photo editing tools keeps legacy users engaged for years
  • Simple and intuitive interface allows users to create photo collages without technical friction
  • Versatile template library provides creative options for social media posts and personal memories
  • Reliable performance across multiple years of consistent daily usage for professional and personal tasks
  • Simple and accessible interface allows users to create photo collages without complex technical knowledge
  • High-quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual social media users
  • AI-powered photo restoration features deliver effective results for damaged or low-quality images
  • Versatile creative tools allow users to produce professional graphic designs without needing advanced technical skills
  • Simple and intuitive editing tools allow creators to produce content without complex learning curves
  • High visual quality of generated videos provides satisfaction for users who successfully complete the process
Complaints
  • Critical failure to load or select photos from the library prevents core functionality
  • Aggressive ad frequency and intrusive video formats disrupt the core editing workflow
  • Frequent and intrusive premium subscription prompts disrupt the creative workflow for free users
  • Aggressive paywall implementation restricts access to basic editing features previously available to free users
  • Aggressive ad frequency and intrusive full-screen pop-ups disrupt the core photo editing workflow
  • Removal of user-defined retouch templates forces manual, repetitive editing for frequent content creators
  • Pay-to-play transition gates previously free features behind subscription tiers, alienating long-term users
  • Aggressive transition to subscription models alienates long-term users who previously held lifetime access
  • Export failures and conversion errors disrupt long-form editing sessions on mobile devices
  • Aggressive monetization via hidden coin costs after subscription payment creates a sense of being scammed
  • Technical failures and processing errors prevent video generation despite successful payment of subscription fees
Requests
  • Project save and recovery functionality to allow editing collages after initial creation
  • Transparent refund processes and responsive customer support for billing disputes
--
  • Restoration of the custom template saving feature to allow for uniform batch editing
  • Expanded export options including PDF support and external brush imports for professional design workflows
  • Expanded library of default music and font options to support diverse creative projects
  • Transparent pricing and free trial access to verify video quality before committing to a subscription
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • One-time purchase model provides a clear alternative to recurring subscription-based photo editors
  • Flexible layout tools allow for non-square aspect ratios and custom border manipulation
  • 20,000+ template library sustains high-volume content creation
  • AI removal tool provides modern utility
  • Long-term legacy user base provides stable baseline
  • Long-standing reliability across nearly a decade of usage builds high user trust
  • Intuitive interface design minimizes technical friction for casual creators
  • Extensive template library sustains recurring daily usage
  • 20,000+ template library creates high switching costs
  • Carousel-collage format provides distinct social-sharing utility
  • 1000+ material library drives recurring subscription value
  • AI-powered portrait detection provides high-fidelity results
  • Multi-track video editor captures social media creator workflows
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • Cloud-sync project history functions as a switching-cost barrier
  • All-in-one design suite integrates video and graphic templates
  • Intuitive UI lowers barrier to entry
  • Offline editing capability provides distinct advantage
  • Generous free-tier asset library
  • Google Veo3 integration provides high-fidelity output
  • Drag-and-drop interface lowers creative barrier
Weaknesses
  • Critical photo-import failure on modern hardware prevents core functionality
  • Lack of project save/recovery forces users to restart work from scratch
  • Multi-year update gap results in frequent crashes on current operating systems
  • Aggressive ad frequency disrupts workflow
  • Lack of refund support drives negative sentiment
  • Subscription paywalling of legacy features triggers churn
  • Premium subscription prompts disrupt the creative workflow for free users
  • Lack of native video-in-collage support limits appeal for motion-focused social media creators
  • Aggressive monetization strategy creates a negative experience for non-paying users
  • Aggressive paywall drives 1★ sentiment
  • Mandatory full-library access causes privacy churn
  • Aggressive ad frequency disrupts core editing flow
  • Removal of custom template-saving forces repetitive manual work
  • Subscription gating of previously free features drives negative sentiment
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • No cloud-save despite 142 requests in reviews
  • Export failures on high-resolution projects
  • Excessive storage consumption
  • Ad placement friction
  • Hidden coin costs post-subscription drive refund surges
  • Technical instability during generation causes crashes
Pricingpaidsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumsubscription
MomentumZombieIntenseMaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseActiveActiveActive
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~22d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~79d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~11d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~21d avg5 versions, ~6d avg

Compare Diptic head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Diptic, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0